User talk:Jamball77

Shoebat

I've reverted you as the consensus is that this is too insignificant a view, see [1]. Dougweller (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus. You took a vote? Jamball77 The point is that this is the only view of Shoebat that makes him interesting in Christian Evangellical, Charismatic, and Neopentacostal circles.

August 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Basmala. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. I see no evidence that http://www.66619.org/, let alone a page no longer there, meets our criteria as a reliable source. If you disagree, please do not edit war (as you said you would do on my talk page over Number of the Beast), but take it to WP:RSN for discussion Dougweller (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Walid Shoebat

Your edits there, both as an IP and with this account, break our policy of no original research - see WP:NOR, of verification, see WP:VERIFY, there was some copyright violation, and please note that a key policy on biographies of living people WP:BLP means that you have to have very good sources (see WP:RS which you really must read before adding any more sources to any article) for any statements about him, praise or criticism, which might be in any way disputed. Dougweller (talk) 19:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Threatening to edit war on Number of the Beast

If you continue to add material with non-reliable sources, I will personally block you. Also be aware of WP:3RR. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]