User talk:Jalvar042
| This user is a student editor in UC_Riverside/Radical_Women_in_Latin_American_Art_(Spring_2019) . |
|
Hi Jalvar042! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jalvar042, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Overall, the article seems very well structured with different headings for different topics. All the information in each topic is only mentioned once so the article in not repeating the same information over and over and so it doesn't sounds too wordy. From what I can tell, none of the writing seems biased. It all sounds very neutral
A few changes that can be made are making the article a bit longer and including more information. I might suggest adding a little more information under "art works" maybe by adding information on what inspired her, what the artwork consists of, what inspired her, what art movement it belongs to, etc. Adding to that, adding more information on her background might be beneficial to get a better sense of who the artist is and why they do what they do. Adding to that, adding some more information under "collections" would be beneficial to those reading this Wikipedia article to get a feeling for what other artists she has been featured with to get a better feeling for what kind of art she makes. Finally, after adding more information, adding more sources if you can find any will make the article more credible.
All in all, the article seems pretty good, I would suggest keep doing what you have been doing. Just add more information and sources to make the page more credible and to have more to offer those who are reading the article.
Jagui075 (talk) 10:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello and welcome! I wanted to drop you a note about the above page. When you moved your draft into the article, some of my edits, including references, were deleted in the process. Your additions were great, but please be careful that you do not overwrite the contributions of other editors that include sourced material (for example in this edit you wiped out five good sources that took me time to find, and three museum collections). I've restored my edits and also kept yours, so the article is better for it. Thanks! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Gloria Camiruagua) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Gloria Camiruagua.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on Gloria Camiruagua.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:07, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
We now have two articles on the same person: Gloria Camiruagua and Gloria Camiruaga (artist). I think the best article title would be Gloria Camiruaga so the current content of Gloria Camiruaga (artist) should be included into the other article. See also: Wikipedia:Merging. --Proofreader (talk) 11:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)