User talk:Jalva390

This user is a student editor in Florida_International_University/2020_Narratives_of_Medicine,_Health_and_Healing_(Spring_2020) .

This user is a student editor in Florida_International_University/Narratives_of_Medicine_Health_and_Healing_(Fall_2019) .

Welcome!

Hello, Jalva390, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Every Patient Tells a Story: Medical Mysteries and the Art of Diagnosis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Every Patient Tells a Story: Medical Mysteries and the Art of Diagnosis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:50, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Every Patient Tells a Story: Medical Mysteries and the Art of Diagnosis (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Every Patient Tells a Story: Medical Mysteries and the Art of Diagnosis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Every Patient Tells a Story: Medical Mysteries and the Art of Diagnosis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jalva390! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Genius Of Marian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Genius Of Marian, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleanup

Hi - I wanted to let you know that I'm doing some speedy cleanup in hopes of preserving the page. Right now I've removed the screening section, as this is typically not something that Wikipedia has, at least in this format. There is often a release section, but this would only contain information about where it first screened and only mention festivals where it's received coverage in independent and reliable sources. It's kind of expected that a film will screen in various locations if it's going the film festival route.

I've also removed the section about the individual people - this should be in a synopsis section, which I've created. As far as other content goes, we should only cover things as they relate to the documentary in specific. Also, make sure that we avoid writing anything that may come across like we're trying to present the documentary as particularly good or in a certain light. I'll have more notes later, but wanted to let you know what I was doing. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What we really need right now are things like reviews for the film in reliable sources, like newspapers. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your help. Do you suggest I include the information about the people in the synopsis?

I would, but I would work it into the synopsis more, so that it helps show how these parts of their history are vital in the film. So for example, it could be set up like this:

Rmv because it poses a copyright issue.

This gets more to the point and helps work it more into a general story format, so to speak. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there is a copyright issue as well - this is actually very important to avoid in an article, as this can lead to it getting deleted for that alone. I'll try and fix that. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Every Patient Tells a Story: Medical Mysteries and the Art of Diagnosis has been accepted

Every Patient Tells a Story: Medical Mysteries and the Art of Diagnosis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]