User talk:Jakeleereed

Welcome!

Hello, Jakeleereed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malice in Wonderland (1985 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{historic-film-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to So This Is Paris may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films with overtures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mammy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manon Lescaut (1926 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UFA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sailor Izzy Murphy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Jessel and Frank Shaw. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of early Warner Bros. talking features, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hot Stuff. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kaiser's Finish

added a link pointing to Kaiser Wilhelm

While London Sleeps

added a link pointing to John Patrick

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sydney Chaplin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Missing Link. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Your recent editing history at Gold Diggers of Broadway shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Beyond My Ken. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Please be careful with terms like "bullying". BMK is within his rights, as an editor, to challenge material that he feels is incorrect. The burden of proof is on the editor making the first change—in this case, you, by adding Technicolor to the article—to provide sources and otherwise "make the case" for the edit. See WP:BRD for more information on the "bold, revert, discuss" cycle of editing. I look forward to seeing some constructive, civil discussion from you at the article's talk page about your proposed change. —C.Fred (talk) 22:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you removed material from somebody else's talk page. Do not do this. (See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing comments.) -- Hoary (talk) 09:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

enough

To https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Beyond_My_Ken once again, Technicolor is a FILM STUDIO. And if you want me blocked, then you should have done it already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeleereed (talk • contribs) 20:09, 2 October 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Jakeleereed:, I've seen your talk page messages (like on User_talk:Acroterion#I.27M_DONE.21.21.21.21.21.21.21) and there is no need to burn your bridges like this. Disputes about content occur every day on Wikipedia on many, many articles. They are common and if you find yourself in disagreement, as you did with BMK, the next step is to discuss the issue on the article talk page and get opinions from other editors to resolve the difference of opinion.

If that method is unsuccessful, you can bring a dispute to an appropriate noticeboard like WP:DR, WP:BLPN or WP:RSN. Forums like WP:ANI, which should be the last place you bring a conflict, are only for complaints about editor conduct and I don't see anything egregious here, just a content dispute over Technicolor.

What you don't do is a) edit-war, b) make personal attacks, and, hopefully, c) decide to quit. Every active editor on Wikipedia has to learn how to handle conflict because it happens all of the time and there is likely no editor here who hasn't gotten warnings posted to their talk page, so do not consider that harassment. And the best way to move on from conflict is to resolve it and continue to make good, solid contributions to the project....which I hope you decide to do. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Show Girl (1928 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joseph Meyer and George Marion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 23:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I'm coming back in 60 hours then. Just so that you know I will no longer bother with you or Beyond My Ken anymore, but all I can say is that the way you two have treated me is disgusting. So it would benefit all of us if you and him keep away from my Talkpage. That is all I have to say to both of you, and from this point on, I will no longer acknowledge or read any of your messages. Jakeleereed ).

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for editing over proxies to evade your block. You were specifically warned about editing logged out — let alone doing it while blocked. Your next block will be indefinite. If you don't want to end up like that, this is the time to look up the advice you've been given — I'm not going to repeat it yet again, but it's all in the history of this page — and make some attempt to follow it. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 19:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bishonen | talk 13:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]