User talk:Jake Corey

Stone Sour album

Please show me a reliable source that says that those tracks are confirmed for the album. If you can't then the information has to be removed per Wikipedia Policy. This website does not deal in rumors. REZTER ^TALK ø 14:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK so were is it? I googled "Rockstar103" and "Rockstar103 corey taylor" and I can't find it. Unless it's verifiable (see WP:V) then it has to be removed. Anybody could add something to Wikipedia and make up a source for it but unless it's verifiable it needs to be removed. Like I could say "Corey Taylor said it in an interview with Blue Rock Magazine" and it doesn't exist. REZTER ^TALK ø 14:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

March 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
This is a warning given concerning your recent edits and comments on the article Corey Taylor. I am assuming bad faith because you showed a clear disregard for Wikipedia policy. REZTER ^TALK ø 13:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with File:Corey Taylor.jpg. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Neil916 (Talk) 10:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with File:Corey_Taylor.jpg. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GregJackP (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This is concerning your continuous addition of track titles to the article Stone Sour's third studio album without correct sourcing. REZTER ^TALK ø 11:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Corey Taylor.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Corey Taylor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. GregJackP (talk) 12:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Disruptive editing.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 14:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest image upload

Since the source information makes no indication that File:Corey Taylor performing at House of Blues.jpg is freely licensed in a manner suitable for use on Wikipedia, I have reverted your addition of said image to the article Corey Taylor. Please see Wikipedia:NFC#UULP and Wikipedia:NFCC#1 for relevant information as to why non-free images are generally unsuitable for biography articles when the subject is still living. You may also wish to re-read the discussion here. Thank you. --Ibn (talk) 12:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Corey Taylor. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Off2riorob (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stone Sour's third studio album‎

The article Stone Sour's third studio album‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:39, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Stone Sour's third studio album

I have nominated Stone Sour's third studio album, an article that you have contributed to, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Sour's third studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DustFormsWords (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]