User talk:Jake12195
Thanks for uploading the seed for the article. Note that I had to radically reverse the statements of the original text. It said that Krick "many times had to break bad news to General Dwight D. Eisenhower, as the invasion was put off several times due to inclimate weather"; in fact, sources say quite the opposite. Krick was strongly against D-day delays, and had to be subdued by superior officers who upheld Petterssen's proposal to move it by one day. Also, as an Air Force man he was not in direct contact with Eisenhower; there were two layers of command (Yates, Spragg) between Krick and the decision-makers. Had Krick's viewpoint prevailed, the Allies would suffer unnecessary losses on June 5. NVO (talk) 21:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Irving P. Krick
[edit]
|
On 4 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Irving P. Krick, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 20:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Earlier today you reverted an edit by IP 50.110.179.255 and left a warning template on their talk page. I've reviewed their edit and it was a positive contribution that fixed a grammatical error. I know that there is a temptation when vandal fighting to make immediate corrections, but it is important to tale a little time to read the edit in context, so useful work isn't lost. We also want to avoid driving useful editors away with incorrect warnings.
As this was a false positive, can you please revert your warning message on their talk page? Thanks. From Hill To Shore (talk) 07:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- From Hill To Shore, Thanks for the heads up! Nice catch, I've reverted my warning. Jake (talk) 08:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi Jake12195. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 03:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Juliancolton, Thanks, much appreciated! Jake (talk) 04:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Mohsen Shaalan
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Mohsen Shaalan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 09:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Mohsen Shaalan
[edit]On 9 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mohsen Shaalan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Egypt's Deputy Minister of Culture Mohsen Shaalan was imprisoned for a year in connection with the unsolved theft of van Gogh's Poppy Flowers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mohsen Shaalan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mohsen Shaalan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)