User talk:Jakavan

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with DelightfulDeliveries.com. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. HalJor 20:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Delightfuldeliveries.com

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Delightfuldeliveries.com, by HalJor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Delightfuldeliveries.com is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Delightfuldeliveries.com, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hey. I have been looking at your article and have tried to make it be kept. I have noticed a few things, don't forget to include edit summaries on all your edits, as this will tell other users what you have done in a snapshot rather than having to go and read them. Also, when you write anything onto talk pages (like this one, or on articles) don't forget to end all your messages with ~~~~ as this will tell users you wrote that comment and what time. I am not trying to tell you off, just remind you so other users don't get annoyed and bite you! Tiddly Tom 21:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tiddly Tom for your help, I really did not want that article to be looked on poorly Jakavan 21:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. When you post on talk page, always post your message at the bottom of the page/section. Don't worry about the post on my page, I'll sort it. Tiddly Tom 21:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delightful deliveries

A tag has been placed on Delightful deliveries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 21:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Deklightfuldeliveries.com

A tag has been placed on Deklightfuldeliveries.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cricketgirl (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Delightfuldeliveries.com

A tag has been placed on Delightfuldeliveries.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cricketgirl (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You're blocked for spamming and the misuse of multiple accounts. This is not an advertising medium. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]