User talk:JagzthebestX

PLEASE SIT, lets Talk....Shall we?

Tekken

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tekken 6, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

I've reverted one of the above user's edits - while you shouldn't have changed the link the user credited vandalism to you that A) wasn't even done by you, and B) wasn't vandalism. Just to let you know. You should also be aware of Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Block_evasion_by_User:Jagzthebest--daniel folsom 04:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to be a bit more civil - what you did on User talk:Michael Mad is quite frankly unacceptable. Put simply - you're a sock puppet - and you're a sock puppet that I think has a slight chance of not being banned - but in order to not be banned you have to be on your best behavior - you have to be damn near perfect because if you aren't banned then the admin will be making an exception - and (s)he won't want to make an exception for any user - so you have to prove you belong here. Good luck.--daniel folsom 05:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roger:Reply

I'll tell you why I called the article Roger; I wanted an umbrella title. I didn't want the article to be called Roger/Alex/Roger Jr., so I decided to use an umbrella title, just like how the Devil and Angel article is just called Devil. I chose Roger because he was the primary costume back when he was playable(Alex was the secondary) and because he has made the most appearances out of the three characters. Oh, and as for me being mad; well, it appears that I'm not alone in that respect. Michael Mad 11:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Procedural - This account has been blocked as an alternate account of an indefinitely blocked user. If you wish to contest your block, please file an appropriate unblock request at the talk page of your main account, or discuss with the administrator(s) who were involved in the original block. Thanks, Deiz talk 12:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JagzthebestX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok I just about have had enough of this. Yes I am Jagzthebest, but the only reason I created this is because my Main account is blocked and the talk page protected from editing. That protection was supposed to expire 7th August 2007 but for some reason someone has replaced it with a 'more specific one' that DOESN'T EXPIRE AT ALL! I can't even post appeal templates! When I do I just get stupid answers such as 'too long to read'. What the hell is this? I keep getting messed around with insane comments and it is actually quite upsetting. I keep trying to be good. My main account was blocked because someone wrote a disturbing/vulgar comment on my page, so I relayed it back to an admin asking for help, but my mistake was posting it in full on his page and asking for help. So he blocks me and suspects the guy that did it in the first place is my sockpuppet???!!! I really need some help on this. If someone could actually just listen to what is going on. If I could only tell this to an admin in full detail, the whole thing from the start, then please reply if there is anyone caring to read.

Decline reason:

That page was protected because of your abuse. It is protected until September 6, 2007. You are not permitted to continue editing while blocked as you are well aware. If you believe the block on that account was invalid, even though multiple administrators have reviewed the block already, you can send one email to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Your continued sockpuppetry is pretty clear evidence that the block was valid, however. — Yamla 15:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.