User talk:JagdeshJouno

Warning

This is JagdeshJouno's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Dont remove tags from the article Report Look if you don't know about wikipedia policies other i will appeal to block your user page please read thei notable guideline of newspaper WP:NEWSNOTE you will find yourself is your article notable or not. This is last warning otherwise you page can be blocked for this nonsense editing and I didn't mention anything abhout notability please read properly.Thank you.Tom Ellis🌈

Find some Notabile source to remove the tag

This is JagdeshJouno's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Do not remove non notability tag from article Report Look as per WP:NME this article is not enough Notabile remove this tag if you have source about this article as the Draft of this article is already declined so please don't remove this whithout any source.Thank you Tom Ellis🌈 13:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Report Look (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Report Look and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Report Look, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JagdeshJouno! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure I will improve it thank you. JagdeshJouno (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, JagdeshJouno,

Before you tag any more pages for speedy deletion, please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion so you know what the criteria are and what name space they apply to. These are agreed-upon criteria set up by the Wikipedia community. You can not just ask for any old page to be deleted and have it deleted. Please learn the criteria and when they apply.

I encourage you to bring any questions you have about the deletion processes on Wikipedia to the Teahouse where you can get assistance from experienced editors. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 13:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

draft article without any rason

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Hi user User:Viewmont Viking drafted by article Draft:Report Look it was already reviewed by admin i dont know wht these are plying with my article.}}

--JagdeshJouno (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know which admin you think has reviewed it. It was first denied, and then you moved it into the mainspace. From there it was tagged for notability, which you removed, then tagged for WP:PROD, which again you removed by you, when the WP:Prod was re-added, another editor removed the PROD based on policy and not based on a review. This article should go through the WP:AFC so an editor that has experience in determining if an article is ready for the mainspace has a chance to review it. VViking_TalkEdits 14:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was rejected after that i improve article and about wp:Prod tag that has been removed by admin please check [1] JagdeshJouno (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was reviewed and declined. You should not have unilaterally moved it into article space. It is now a draft and should remain that way until it is accepted by a reviewer. Please stop disrupting the process.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Report Look

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JagdeshJouno (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Report Look moved to draftspace

When you feel that Draft:Report Look meets the criteria for notability for companies and/or the general notability guideline, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move it to mainspace yourself. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, bonadea i tried to submit via Afc but by mistake i put it to main-space .

--JagdeshJouno (talk) 11:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how you can do a page move without knowing what you're doing unless you're incompetent, in which case you shouldn't be editing here. I've blocked you indefinitely for a combination of disruptive editing and incompetence. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Report Look (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources, and no claim to notability. The only source added since it was declined in September is muckrack.com.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Report Look and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Report Look, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Report Look

Hello, JagdeshJouno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Report Look, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]