User talk:Jag666

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. JBsupreme (talk) 08:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Debbie Gibson. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. It's traditional to sign at the end of the post. Tabercil (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. JBsupreme (talk) 14:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editors Removing Links

This is not an Admin issue, unless you keep on adding inappropriate links. If you take a look at WP:NOT, you'll find we are an encyclopedia and not a vehicle for promotion or advertising- this is largely due to our educational, and therefore charitable, legal status. It's also the reason we have a policy on external links, particularly which links are not permitted. In the case of bands, we link to official fansites and their own MySpace or YouTube pages where appropriate, but not to unofficial sites or anything falling outside the purpose of an encyclopedia. It's not a case of "injustice", because that's not what Wikipedia is for; there are plenty of other websites where such links are welcome. Also, it does have to be said that there are many inappropriate links on such articles, but that is no reason to allow others elsewhere. Hope that helps. --Rodhull andemu 18:20, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 18:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jag666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Be cool to people we don't live on only wiki and we didn't do anything to get blocked.Noone is listening to me they removed my external links and noone is giving right answers. I ask everyone according to wiki rules they shouldn't be social networking sites ad many other sites.What about sonicbids, soundlick and ibdm?? your all confusing us wasting our time and runing wiki.May be your drowning wiki.

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Further uses of the unblock template that are not unblock requests will result in this page being protected. Protonk (talk) 05:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jag666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't understand why these editors are hateful to me in this way. Im telling one more time i didn't do anything that deserved to get blocked.Im talking about my rights here and you blocked me.But noone is talking about the external links i referred.If the site is popular you think the link is right.If its not popular you think we spam.Also they delete all my actions.you were asking me make productive contributions.Well i did someone removed the links and the editors on only on ego rides. we don't need to discuss this much about an external link like this.Is there anyway i can complaint to wiki directly? . I don't have a chance to protect myself.Its completely unfair and justice has not been done. We are here to learn something but not to aruge like this.

Decline reason:

Inadequate request, page protected per warning above. Sandstein 09:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.