User talk:Jadepearl

Fat-tailed sheep

Are the fat-tailed sheep breeds of domestic sheep (Ovis aries)? Probably the fat-tailed sheep article should be listed under the "See also" section of Sheep or Domestic sheep article. What do you think? —Donama 05:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it looks like you might be a new user of Wikipedia. Please let me know if you have any questions about contributing. Cheers! Donama 05:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

You can make a new article at Listerdale Mystery with one line saying

#REDIRECT [[The Listerdale mystery]]

Then it should automatically go to the The Listerdale mystery regardless of capitalisation. Of course, if you think the original article is badly named, then you might want to move the existing article to the new name (and put the redirect from the old name). If you'd like advice on how to move an article to a new name, let me know. Cheers! Donama 07:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked, and in this case a "move" seems more appropriate. See the button next to history. Use that to simply move the article. Normally if the article name change would be controversial there is a longer process, but it sounds like this one wouldn't be controversial. Donama 07:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmmmm.....

Your recent edits are making me hungry. Saffron buns, chelsea buns...... Joyous | Talk 02:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snoek

My advice is, to move snoek to Thyrsites atun and make a disambiguation page at the former. (I note that there are quite a few snoeks: see [1].) Gdr 15:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not worth listing all the FishBase common names at the snoek disambiguation page, or even only the ones in English. The ideal would be to find groups all (or mostly) carrying the name, so that you end up with a page like eel (disambiguation) or knifefish. In this case, I note that most of the "snooks" in the genus Centropomus are also known as "snoeks", so you could have a single entry for that genus noting the variant spelling.

You might even choose to redirect snoek to snook and disambiguate two two spellings together. Gdr 17:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism on one's watchlist

Go into the vandalised page's history. See the version just before the vandalised one - click on this version (by clicking the date). Click to edit the current page (which is editing the same article, but in the format it was in before the vandalism). Put some message like "reverting vandalism" in the edit summary box and then save it. Good luck, and thanks for reverting the vandals! Donama 03:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kermes mineral, Kermite and medicinal uses of antimony

I think it would be a good idea to include some information about the historical medical uses of antimony compounds in the article about antimony. At least a sentence or two would be good. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:37, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About move requests

You chose to oppose the move of sucking pig on grounds that weren't really relevant to the discussion. We're not voting on removing information, but to use the most common name based on the Wikipedia:Naming conventions. There are also very good reasons for doubting (or even completely rejecting) the validity of Davidson's claim about the etymology of the word, though we will keep it as it seems to be a popular minority opinion on the issue. Either way, I believe you should reconsider your stance.

Peter ^Isotalo 13:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

That section in the Yazid article flagrantly violated NPOV. It did not have credible sources. Most people agree that Yazid was nothing more than a drunk, corrupt murderer. Saying otherwise would be absurd. Embargo 19:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe Pilot AfD

Due to the seeming confusion over the AfD caused by the two different articles, and the merging of the two into one, I have withdrawn the original AfD and nominated the single article for AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilot (Fringe). As someone who commented on the original, I wanted to alert you to the new AfD so you can revisit and state your position on this single article. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bow Wow Sauce for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bow Wow Sauce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bow Wow Sauce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Richigi (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David M. Levinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WRSA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Levinson (October 17)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Levinson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 20:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stanley K. Cheng

The article Stanley K. Cheng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP with iffy notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

search: Stanley K. Cheng Meyer cookware .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]