User talk:JadenMcElvey

This user is a student editor in Georgia_Institute_of_Technology/Writing_Women_Back_into_Tech_History_(Summer_2019) .

Welcome!

Hello, JadenMcElvey, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alex's peer review

Lead: The topic is covered. It includes what field she worked in as well as when she lived and worked in this field including her important works. It gives the most important information from the rest of the page.

Structure: The structure is clear. There are heading and subheading in the larger sections of the article. Different stages of her life in the biography section are clearly separated for example.

Balance: The article is written in a neutral tone. No point of view is imposed onto the reader and it seems that nothing controversial is excluded from the article. No conclusions are drawn from the article. The section about her university life seems longer than the one about her work so more should be added to that section as it is supposed to be the most important one according to the lead.

Neutral content: The content is neutral. I do not know the perspective of the author by reading the article No descriptive words such as "the best" or "the worst" are used in this article to give the authors view of the subject.

Reliable sources: All the statements in the article are linked to one of the sources. It is mostly separated between the variable sources. There is no information without a source.

Asikorsky (talk) 18:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marlene Hazle has been accepted

Marlene Hazle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 23:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]