User talk:Jadaboujaoude

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Meryem Uzerli has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Meryem Uzerli was changed by Jadaboujaoude (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902914 on 2015-09-10T22:16:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meryem Uzerli with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Roxelana. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 06:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hallo, and thanks for writing. No, your disruptive editing has consisted in using deliberately misleading edit summaries to confuse other editors. Moreover, please bring reliable sources in order to justify your changes, since about these changes there is a low intensity edit war going on since years. Alex2006 (talk) 09:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jadaboujaoude, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jadaboujaoude! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]