User talk:Jacoplane/archive11

This is an archive of inactive discussion. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.

Re:Hee

Voor een land met zoveel internet is het dan toch bar slecht gesteld met de contributies aan de engelse WP:CVG. Ik hoop in de toekomst nog veel samen te kunnen werken! --User:Krator (t c) 22:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page move?

You think its time to move the Portal:Computer and video games to Portal:Video games? Thunderbrand 02:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alizee Videos

Hey, do you think it will be possible to dig up information like director, shoot location etc for Alizee's videos? So that we may create a table on the lines of Shania Twain videography. That really summarizes a lot of information in a short place. --soum^সৌমোyasch 20:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent vandalism from an IP you warned

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/137.89.251.93 All of these are acts of vandalism. Not a single constructive edit before or after the warn. Maurog 16:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a vanal Kn

Could you please disable account creation on that IP, please? Will ^{(Speak to Me/Breathe)}_{(Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash)} 16:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Koning" Simon

Alhoewel een overtuigd republikein kan ik niet anders dan jouw compliment met een zeker koninklijk genoegen in ontvangst nemen. "Wij danken u." Maar serieus, dit is maar een klein beetje werk in vergelijking met wat er is bij gehouden op Fourth Balkenende cabinet, Dutch general election, 2006 en 2006–2007 Dutch cabinet formation: ik zet alleen maar de puntjes op de i van een zeer geslaagde group effort. C mon 23:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrix image

This image should be removed, it has also been removed from commons. Personally i think it is a shame it is on the main page. TeunSpaans 08:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image is still on commons as Image:Beatrix05.jpg. Why do you feel it should be removed? JACO PLANE • 2007-02-23 09:03

Your link to commons on the image description page is invalid, and a search on beatrix didnt yield it as a result. The license given there is incorrect, the dutch text for the license doesnt mention any license. I just tried to list it at commons as ifd, but somehow it doesnt turn up on the list. TeunSpaans 10:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, listed for deletion at commons. TeunSpaans 10:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well there are loads of images on commons just like this one, see Category:Files by User:Paulblank from nl.wikipedia. JACO PLANE • 2007-02-23 10:37

OK, since I don't feel like making this an issue I've removed the image from the main page. JACO PLANE • 2007-02-23 10:44

Thx both for removing and pointing out the collection. I don't know how to handle the whole category on commons, but we'll find out. TeunSpaans 11:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Digg

Are you still a member of Digg? --Thorpe | talk 20:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ortoli_Prodi_Barroso_Delors.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ortoli_Prodi_Barroso_Delors.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 00:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Signature

It appears that you are using templates in your signature. I consider you to remove them because transcluded signatures require extra processing— whenever you change your signature source and all talk pages you have posted on must be re-cached; they are also vandalism targets, and will be forever. — Meteoroid ← 03:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(if you are, then how do you explain the timestamp of your signature) — Meteoroid ← 03:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, there are no transcluded templates in my signature... JACO PLANE • 2007-02-24 10:43

Then how did you customize the timestamp of your signature if you did not use transcluded templates? — Meteoroid ← 18:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby WikiProject

Hey Jaco, how much do you like Kirby? - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, top priority for making into Good articles are Kirby (Nintendo), Kirby (series), and Kirby's Dream Land. I've began work on Kirby's Dream Land, although I need to expand on graphics and sound sections. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]