User talk:Jacobkennedy

Welcome!

Hello, Jllproductions, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as JLL Productions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Abhijay ^☎(Тalk)/_{✍ (My Deeds)}

Speedy deletion nomination of JLL Productions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JLL Productions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from kook Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Abhijay ^☎(Тalk)/_{✍ (My Deeds)} 04:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have actually used to update info in a lot of the Lgbt rights pages so got many topics like that I will research and add missing info, edit other pages for mistakes in accuracy and grammar, and on occasion flag inappropriate pages that seem to not fit your guidelines like you rightfully did on my jll productions page. Please give me another chance to show you would like really do for you and your site. Thanks. What I will use Wiki for if I`m unblocked January 2012== Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Abhijay ^☎(Тalk)/_{✍ (My Deeds)} 04:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Jllproductions, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jacobkennedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

jpoland (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Declined due to lack of response to the questions below. Also, your proposed username is already taken. Feel free to post another unblock request when you're ready to communicate in a timely manner. Max Semenik (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the three important principles above. Nick-D (talk) 07:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobkennedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

jacobkennedy

Decline reason:

You still need to answer the questions above. Since you cannot edit Wikipedia articles directly related to your company, what do you plan to do on Wikipedia instead? Your username is only part of the problem. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?, conflict of interest, and that the subject must be notable? Let me change my name to jacobkennedy. I plan to use it just to edit articles, correct and add on to them, I will NOT use it for any commercial gain or promotion. {{unblock-un|jacobkennedy}}

So, what type of articles do you think you might edit? While we normally assume good faith, since the only thing your account was used for previously was promotion, we need some clear indication of how this account will be used in constructive ways. So, tell us an article or two, and tell us how you would change them if unblocked. You don't need to list the exact details, just some idea would help. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC

)I have actually used to update info in a lot of the Lgbt rights pages so got many topics like that I will research and add missing info, edit other pages for mistakes in accuracy and grammar, and on occasion flag inappropriate pages that seem to not fit your guidelines like you rightfully did on my jll productions page. Please give me another chance to show you would like really do for you and your site. Thanks. What I will use Wiki for if I`m unblocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jllproductions (talk • contribs)

Well, I'm willing to believe that you now understand the rules, and that you can be unblocked; of course, any future editing related to your company would require that you be reblocked, but I think we can trust you won't do that. I'm going to ask the blocking administrator if an unblock is okay with him. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per his note to me, I have unblocked you. Please put your request for a new username in at WP:CHU/SIMPLE as soon as you read this; when it is granted, you may edit as you please within policy. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC) I sent my new name, now I'm just waiting on approval.[reply]

Note: User has an open CHU/S request. Mlpearc (powwow) 17:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You were asked whether you were comfortable using your real name, but you haven't answered while continuing to edit. Please do so or we will have to block you again. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and don't mind using my real name. Thanks

March 2014

Hello, I'm Dougweller. I noticed that you made a change to an article, LGBT rights in Iraq, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 06:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC) I had given a source to prove that gays get killed in Somalia but they rejected it out of spite/vandalism/ego. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jllproductions (talk • contribs) 23:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. AcidSnow (talk) 23:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. AcidSnow (talk) 00:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I blocked both Jacobkennedy and Jllproductions indefinitely. This account was renamed, and you then used both accounts in tandem to edit-war. To request an unblock, use {{unblock}} and see WP:GAB.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobkennedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Acidsnow was trolling me, not letting me discuss the edit with him about the LGBT rights in Somalia page, he refused to respond on my post on his talk page and left me no choice but to keep editing it. That was the only way he responded to me. I had to be involved in an edit war because of that it was hard to avoid. But if you still think I should be banned you should ban him too, he was involved in the edit war too64.121.83.151 (talk) 10:35, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, I will assume that the IP address is you: we do not accept unblocks from anyone other than the logged-in user. Second, see WP:NOTTHEM. If you weren't violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO in the first place, none of this would have happened - so the entire thing is entirely your own personal fault. the panda ₯’ 11:18, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

He has also been socking quite some time so can something be done about his disruptive ip? AcidSnow (talk) 15:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been socking, you just have something out against me trying to bully me. That's why you reported me for making you feel like you "lost" which is your insecurity not mine. I'm doing nothing wrong, leave me alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.83.151 (talk) 15:26, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you reading anything that is sent to you? You have been socking before and after your ban; which you still claim not to be doing. Your ban has been very helpful for the Wikipedia community. Why? Because you were edit warring, making personal attacks, and being plain disruptive. Your block had nothing to do with me, but rather entirely brought upon yourself and anyone can see that.AcidSnow (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

64.121.83.151

blocked, 64.121.83.151 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aronzak (talk • contribs) 12:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobkennedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock me please I apologize. I will do no more accounts wp:sockpuppet, unjust reverting wp:ew and wp:3w, wp:vandalism, posting bias view sources wp:npov and rule breaking I promise to contribute constructively instead of wp:disruptive and be wp:civil. Please unban

Decline reason:

You currently have an IP blocked for a year due to your consistent sock puppetry and block evasion. You haven't shown that you understand the reasoning for your block, and that you have continued with the same behavior that led to a block in the first place. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That ip was banned way before now. It was banned June 26th 2017, this is January 2018 it's been 7+months since thenJacobkennedy (talk) 03:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey that's funny--you're still socking! Drmies (talk) 16:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're STILL socking! Oh, IPs aren't ever "banned". Come on now. Drmies (talk) 03:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]