User talk:Jacob Yaltov

"They asked me what I wanted to be. I said happy. They said you don't understand the assignment. I said you don't understand life." -John Lennon.

I'm sorry

When I replied, "Race and IQ */ Reply".

I didn't realize you had made the topic. I thought it was a topic, originally, to change those references in the article.

The article still references Richard Lynn's work even though there are calls to retract his racist eugenic work in journals,[1] months ago, the wiki article didn't, in my opinion, give enough context to his flawed work and his proud avowed Racism.

My statement was not aimed at you but at the subject because previously the article did use race terms pretty heavily because Richard Lynn's work uses race terms (incorrectly, I might add). Normally, Wikipedia uses article talk pages to reach consensus on removal/change of contentious material like that and I was making that comment with that in my mind because I was worried that either race based elements hadn't been removed or had been put back in.

In closing, I'm sorry if I came off as to attack, incite, or attempting to belittle your very real objections to the subject. RCSCott91 (talk) 16:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I also apologize if I came across hostile as well. I think there was a bit of misunderstanding between us, but I did not find what you said insulting at all. I believe it sounds like we are both coming from the exact same place in regards to our concern for the article, so I am happy to work with you going forward. Jacob Yaltov (talk) 17:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please even if you don't intend to edit it because of personal reservations. Bookmark that page, best case so hopefully you can see how it is gradually getting better. Wikipedia needs editors WP:EP, you truly sound like your heart is in the right place. RCSCott91 (talk) 17:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so welcoming, I truly do appreciate it! and I will do! Jacob Yaltov (talk) 18:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Confirmed to Coldstone Steve Boston. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 12:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yamla, I submitted a review, I would like to know exactly what I did that is considered abusive, as I did not see anything listed on the abusive page. Am I not allowed to create a new account if another account of mine was banned? I did not edit the same pages etc, I followed the clean start rule. Jacob Yaltov (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacob Yaltov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: I did not use this account abusively

Decline reason:

What you're describing here is block evasion. If you honestly believe you did nothing wrong, then that is compelling reason not to unblock you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My previous account was banned for supposedly being a sock puppet of another user, so I created a new account. However, I have looked at the page in regard to being abusive, and I have committed zero abusive actions. I did not even edit the same pages etc. I would like my account reinstated and would like an explanation of why I was accused of being abusive. Jacob Yaltov (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sputnik, I was under the impression that I could make a new account if a previous had been blocked, if I followed the rules of clean start, my IP block had expired by the point I signed up for a new account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Yaltov (talk • contribs) 19:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you misunderstood. A "clean start" is not available to a blocked editor, and no, you are not allowed to create a new account to avoid the effect of a block. The only acceptable way to return to editing is through an unblock request for your original account. You should also bear in mind that the more often you evade the block on your original account, the less likely it will become that you will ever be unblocked. JBW (talk) 13:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ashraful Hussain

added a link pointing to Haripur

Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000

added a link pointing to CFMA

James B. Potash

added a link pointing to Depression

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]