User talk:Jacob12190

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Boston. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nakon 21:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful

Please be careful and double-check your edits when using Twinkle. If you need help or want to try it out, please use the sandbox. Nakon 21:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Automobile. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Favonian (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet case

Can you explain the users listed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacob? We're not sure what's going on, as most of those aren't actually accounts. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Test, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 21:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE

Toyota'

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Toyota', and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Toyota. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-12-13/In the news

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-12-13/In the news, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 21:36, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Macintosh 128

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Macintosh 128, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Macintosh 128K. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goooooooooooogle

The article Goooooooooooogle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Direct copy of http://library.duke.edu/research/citing/within/mla.html & does not contain any material that meets the notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jd027 (talk) 02:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Goooooooooooogle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krakatoa Katie 02:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goooooooooooogle

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Goooooooooooogle, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Krakatoa Katie 02:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 48 hours

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 14:27, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You recently came out of a block for creating inappropriate files. Now you've created User talk:81.156.113.249 containing a bogus warning to a user who hasn't edited in several years. Oh, and you signed using somebody else's signature! Favonian (talk) 14:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]