User talk:Jackwag
December 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to 2023 University of Nevada, Las Vegas shooting, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
January 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:2023 University of Nevada, Las Vegas shooting—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- ur such a nerd lmao Jackwag (talk) 11:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Bruh let me edit again please. I’ll just make another account Jackwag (talk) 06:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Notification: Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC) - Bruh let me edit again Jackwag (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not bloody likely -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- bruh that was in a talk page u acting like I made that an edit. I actually wanna edit again. Also that’s not what I meant by correcting my mistakes I meant I’m gonna edit correctly now. Damn bro. Jackwag (talk) 07:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I made a good point in that talk page. U wiki higher ups so weird. Like why do u like Wikipedia so much? Is this the only spot u was able to be important in ur fields ur interested in? By reporting all the base knowledge already known by people ACTUALLY involved in those fields? Like ur not him. Get a job Jackwag (talk) 07:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not bloody likely -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Block Appeal
[edit]
Jackwag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel as though an indefinite block is far too extreme. Please unblock me so I can correct my mistakes and make Wikipedia a better, more informed place.
Decline reason:
Indefinite is not infinite. No worries, Your mistakes have been corrected. As there is no indication you would stop your vandalism after a short term block, you will be blocked until and unless you address the reasons for your block and convince us you will make constructive edits. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block Appeal 2
[edit]Jackwag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have a pretty good history of edits,primarily my work on Danilo CavalcanteThis was a stupid mistake and a one time occurrence. Also, I believe the points I was ultimately trying to make were valid. Please let me edit again. I apologize.
Decline reason:
This is not remotely convincing. Your prior edit combined with the comments on this talk page indicate Wikipedia is better off leaving you blocked. Yamla (talk) 10:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Fucking losers
[edit]Thanks for the block. See u guys on my other IP Jackwag (talk) 16:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Haha
[edit]Jackwag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I gave a good reason last time. See u guys on my other IP. Also, have u guys ever thought of expanding knowledge on a field or subject instead of reporting the base knowledge on an article a few people a month read? You and I both know you only edit here because it makes u feel like u belong in ur field, which u don’t. Ur all losers. I’m 16 and an Ivy League commit. Y’all r some weirdos. Peace Jackwag (talk) 16:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not an unblock request. Talk page access removed due to personal attacks. 331dot (talk) 16:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
January 2024
[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
is open. @331dot: for your consideration. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)