User talk:Jacktwitter

October 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Butlins— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Butlins. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 14:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Privatization, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Privatization was changed by Jacktwitter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900494 on 2018-10-23T14:59:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ryanair. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 16:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacktwitter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because I have not vandalised Wikipedia, I edited airlines and Butlins pages! My edits are constructive I will not add unconstructive edits again

Decline reason:

Haven't you just contradicted yourself there by saying your edits were constructive but you won't make unconstructive ones again? Anyway, I can't unblock you if you think those edits were constructive. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account is Confirmed to Strictly2018 (talk · contribs), anyway. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]