User talk:JackiePriel

March 2017

Hello, I'm Antonioatrylia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Robin Antin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, JackiePriel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paradiso Girls, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pussycat Dolls Present: The Search for the Next Doll. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been adding unsourced and promotional info regarding Chelsea Korka across numerous articles. That is considered spamming and could be grounds for a block. Please stop. Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been ‘’’blocked’’’ ‘’’indefinitely’’’ from editing for persistently making disruptive edits including multiple controversial edits or those with unverifiable content despite several warnings. Further, as the account is new and has made targeted edits to specific articles there is concern of the intention of the account and possible sock puppetry. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NJA (t/c) 06:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]