User talk:Jack kiragu

Jack kiragu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jack kiragu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

ABLSOUTELY unfair and not accurate. According to wikipedias conflict of interest clause

Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships. Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest. That someone has a conflict of interest is a description of a situation, not a judgement about that person's opinions, integrity, or good faith." Iam NOT promoting myself. wikipedia does not say you cannot make the the public aware of a product. Iam not a PAID editor I am not citing myself. I strongly dispute your optinion and can say that this appears to be biased compared to all the other companies i see being promoted openly on wikipedia. I cited articles written by others and you still block material that i am trying to publish in good faith. that is not fair by any measureJack kiragu (talk) 21:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The contest speedy deletion buttion you llude to does not work. please provide a link that actualy works so that i can contest this action. very unfair.As i explained yesterday i have no intention of promoting myself.At no point did i promote myself and you using inpfrmation i provided to you against me in this manner is pure bias and i contest that.Jack kiragu (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:44, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion
a CV/resumé
a lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:44, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please move your content to your user sandbox or the draft article space to create a work in progress. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you . i just looked at Apple inc. an i see no personal topic there about the founders , i do see a lot of information about a business , its origins , its operations, products and business information , that is what i what trying to replicate.. how come apple is able to do this but mot Mobiklift??Jack kiragu (talk) 16:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc./ref> Please define wikimedia activities.. because i was under the impression that i was creating legit content.Jack kiragu (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When I said "Wikimedia-related activities", I meant your work on any of the projects operated by the Wikimedia Foundation - including Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikivoyage, Wikispecies, Wikisource, and Wikinews. A lot of people are unaware that Wikipedia is only one of many related projects.

Wikipedia only includes articles about notable topics - those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Wikipedia. We consider evidence from reliable and independent sources to gauge this attention. There are more specific definitions of notability as they pertain to companies and organizations.

The reason that Mobiklift doesn't have an article is because it doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable enough for inclusion. You cited three sources: one is the company website. While that is a valid primary source, we require independent sources to establish notability. The other two have only very brief mentions of the company - this is not sufficiently in-depth for them to be considered reliable sources.

All is not lost, though. If you can find other reliable, independent sources that discuss the company in-depth, then there is still a chance. In the meantime, please move your content off of your user page and into an appropriate draft or sandbox page. If you prefer, I can do it for you.

Since you're a new user, I recommend that you review the Wikipedia:Tutorial and Wikipedia:Your first article. These will help you learn about editing and hopefully help you avoid some of the common pitfalls that new editors encounter. Good luck to you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but i beg to differ on my citations.The two that i give besides the website were news outlets sources in a relevant and related category pertaining to Mobiklift products.They are according to wikipedia "reliable sources By third parties , they are articles by notable "independent"news outlets in the automotive industry. In addition the product is NOTABLE in the sense that is is a new invention with a GRANTED PATENT #(D735083).the only valid and patented product of its kind.HOW? is that not a notable achievemtn that warrants a global notoriety? Part of gaining global notoriety involves being displayed via wikipedia. Perhaps we do not have the millions that apple have to automatically qualify us.Thats ok... We will soon.Thank you if you dont allow us then there is no need for a wikipedia account for me, but please give us a chance.Jack kiragu (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After reading your last comments and doing some searching, I found that you have an affiliation with this business. As such you have a conflict of interest.

Your statement that "Part of gaining global notoriety involves being displayed via wikipedia" is 100% irrelevant. Wikipedia does not exist for the self-serving interests of its users, including publicity and promotion. Wikipedia's mission is to provide the public with articles that summarize accepted knowledge, written neutrally and sourced reliably. Readers expect to find neutral articles about topics already proven notable, written independently of their subject; not corporate or personal webpages, or platforms for advertising and self-promotion. Articles should contain only material that complies with Wikipedia's content policies and best practices, and Wikipedians must place the interests of the encyclopedia and its readers above personal concerns.

For this reason I am nominating your page for deletion. You may contest it if you wish, and the reviewing administrator will consider your arguments. In the meantime, familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's plain and simple conflict of interest guide. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jack kiragu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Jack kiragu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jack kiragu! You created a thread called Uploading images that i own at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays to you too96.77.43.99 (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]