User talk:Jack Willow

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Kenneth Cromer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ^(C/SSG)G2sai_(talk) 18:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Help Please?

Hi Jack Willow. No, you did not violate any polices when you created the article, Kenneth Cromer. When you blanked the page, per speedy deletion criterion G7, it was assumed that you had requested that the page be deleted. If that was not the case, let me know and I'll be happy to provide you with a copy of the deleted text. As for uploading and using images, the WP:IMAGE page puts it quite nicely (specifically, see this and this). Hope that helps to clarify things. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:21, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenneth B. Cromer

A tag has been placed on Kenneth B. Cromer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please add messages to an article's talk page, instead of an article itself, such as you did to Kenneth B. Cromer. In this case, your reasoning for keeping the page belongs on the talk page, which can be accessed by viewing the article and clicking "talk" at the top of the page. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to take your time to establish the notability of this individual, please do so in the draft in your userspace. When notability has been established, you may recreate the article, although it may be best to ask an administrator or at one of the help desks whether it will be deleted again. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Moving a Page

Sure, I'd be happy to help. Which page(s) do you intend to move? -FASTILY ^(TALK)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenneth B. Cromer

A tag has been placed on Kenneth B. Cromer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 02:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kenneth B. Cromer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Kenneth B. Cromer, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Eeekster (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:KennethB.Cromer.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KennethB.Cromer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badger Maps (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badger Maps and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jack Willow, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Badger Maps concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Badger Maps, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Badger Maps

Hello, Jack Willow. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Badger Maps".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because, in Draft talk:Badger Maps, you recanted your declaration in WP:REFUND#Draft:Badger Maps that you would work on the article, there was zero reason to restore it in the first place. Wikipedia isn't a place for indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for the encyclopedia. Please be aware that if nobody improves it over the next few months, it will be deleted again, likely permanently. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Badger Maps

Hello, Jack Willow. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Badger Maps".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Badger Maps has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Badger Maps. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 00:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Badger Maps concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Badger Maps, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]