User talk:Jack248

Please check out here: [1] ~Rangeley (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln

Several different editiors have removed the "Ethopian ancestry" section from the article. I think the onous must now be on those seeking to add the content to make a case for it on the article's talkpage. WjBscribe 01:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Oromo Liberation Front, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 13:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The OLF page has been recently improved and the problem solved. Jack248

Kenya article

Hi Jack. I noticed that you added the following to the Kenya Article: "Cushitic-speaking people, as termed by Schloezer, from northern Africa, moved into the area that is now Kenya beginning around 2000 BC. Arab traders began frequenting the Kenya coast around the 1st century AD." I'm a bit confused by what you added. Who is Schloezer. Also can you add a reference to this. Thanks so much. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 19:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ethiopia has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for dropping by with your concern. The Edit i made about Ethiopia was simply replacing with the appropriate source. I have also provided an Edit explanation in the Edit summary. Regarding the sources, if you go back a few weeks into the page, a couple of random sources that don't have any relation to the sentence that ends with the phrase "culminating in its victory over the Italians at the Battle of Adwa in 1896 with the military leadership of Ras Makonnen, and ensuring its sovereignty and freedom from colonization" were randomly added. I removed those unrelated sources after carefully checking them and reading their topics and replaced them with a textbook previously quoted appropriately. This source has been correctly used before for the phrase above and related topics so it is important that the sentences always match and reflect the sources given. I will put back the source but if you have any questions or concerns let me know in this talk page ahead of time. thanks Jack248 17:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Arab and Ottoman support

You're right to state their importance in the latter half of the war, but the section you wrote was on the war itself. If you discussed perhaps the Imam's specific dealings with the Turks and Arabs (not just that he had Turk and Arab musketeers and cannoneers), then it would have been more appropriate, though. Try rewriting it with more specific information if you have it. Otherwise, add it to the Ethiopian-Adal War article, which is in need of a lot of work. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 05:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somalia

If you dispute the content of the article please take your concerns to the talkpage and we can discuss it over there. --Scoobycentric (talk) 23:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Hello, I've reverted Meles Zenawi back to the previous version. I don't see how your edit summary ("edits seems accurate, though lacks sources" [2]) justified the restoration of the text. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 13:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refugee article original research

Hi. I reverted your edits to the refugee article because they constitute original research. You need to provide sources to back up your claims that asylum seekers move for economic reasons. Citing some sources that claim that individual asylum seekers have done so is not enough - the sources need to establish that this is a notable phenomenon. Even if it is, I'm not sure that the information belongs in the refugee article since refugees by definition meet the criteria for asylum. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Medrek. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jack248! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Regina Abelt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ethiopia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black lions (gang), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Lion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

black lions (gang)

Hello. It looks like you meant to include a reference on black lions (gang), but you ended up just including a tag for a reference without specifying what. You might want to have another look at that. Thanks, Morwen - Talk 13:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oromo Liberation Front may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

region, proceeded to take Nekemte, a city in Oromia. In response, the Oromo Liberation Front ) said in a broadcast on the Radio Voice of Oromo Liberation (Frankfurt am Main) on 15 April 1991: "
Conference%20and%20Seminar/Papers/2001%20papers/PaperIII8.pdf Oromo rule of Abyssinia]</ref><ref>[http://www.salem-news.com/articles/july282013/oromo-truths-fl.php Oromo rule of Gondar 1700s</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OLF page

Hello mate, you added a section called '"Abyssinian Colonialism" terminology dispute' to the Oromo Liberation Front page. I've added that info under the "Colonial Claims" subsection under Criticism of the OLF. If you think it deserves it's own section, feel free to undo my revision but I would suggest you leave it because it looked out of place between the History section and the Alleged Terrorism section. I would also like to point out that one of the articles you used as a reference (Oromo History 101) has been disputed as being incorrect and there have been suspicions as to who its alleged author was. LencaOromo (talk) 01:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ogaden National Liberation Front, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 21:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Addis Ababa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oromo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mengistu Haile Mariam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oromo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global Fire Power

Hi Jack248. First of all, thanks for the link; it's quite interesting. That said, Global Fire Power appears to be the original ranking. Nazret just links to it and annotates a regional ranking. However, as a blog, the latter is not a reliable source. I agree, though, that although Global Fire Power's ranking is global (hence its tradename), 40th is rather bland. I therefore suggest we note its ranking in Africa as a whole (3rd after Egypt and Algeria), and link that directly to Global Fire Power. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zenawism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zenawism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenawism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jack248. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jack248. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abebe Aregai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oromo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amharic

It looks like you've been editing Wikipedia for many years now. So why do you think it is fine to cough up population numbers out of nowhere and claim that they are stated in a source that apparently you didn't even look at, as you did in your recent edits on Amharic? Landroving Linguist (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amharic page is missing “second language” speakers, which are the non-Amhara population in Ethiopia who speak the language but are not native to it. That is why it was added. Jack248 (talk) 04:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]