User talk:Jack.OSull

File copyright problem with File:DMU Clephan Building.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:DMU Clephan Building.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:DMU Clephan Building.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DMU Clephan Building.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — mholland (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied on my talk page. — mholland (talk) 00:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi

How is your university and please tell something you know about exams and valuation there !

SyberGod (chat)

Campus Ambassador interest

Hi Jack.OSull ,

Thank you for expressing interest for the Wikipedia Campus Ambassador programme. In order to be trained in this first wave of Ambassadors in June, we would like you to apply to participate in the program, however in order to do this we need to correspond via e-mail. If you could please e-mail me at this link, I will send you additional information, including the application form. The application process is mostly to screen for quality candidates amongst interested participants, and we are mostly looking for expression of passion to teach and lead with Wikipedia! Best of wishes, and I look forward to your e-mail, Sadads (talk) 05:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron S. French

Do you have a source that says he went to De Montfort University? I didn't see anything like that in the sources I have. (not saying he didn't, just that I'd like you to add it to the article and source it) —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 13:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nichole de Carle

A tag has been placed on Nichole de Carle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Yunshui (talk) 08:07, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:DMU Logo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:DMU Logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 22:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]