User talk:Jacarr

Hi Jacarr, and welcome to wikipedia. I noticed your edits to Richard Rathwell and just wanted to suggest that you use {{fact}} to tag dubious claims. Thanks, bobanny 21:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Here's the official welcome message, with some useful tips and resources: Welcome...[reply]

Hello, Jacarr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! bobanny 22:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cystic fibrosis

I noticed that you added two links to the cystic fibrosis article. Both links do not meet the external links guideline and just thought I would let you know why. A blog is generally frowned upon as an external link unless it's written by a "recognized authority". As for the organ donation link it's indirectly related to cystic fibrosis. Looking over the external link guidelines gives you a good idea what's a good external link and what isn't. Hope this helps. --ImmortalGoddezz 21:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Bendrigg Trust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bendrigg Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bendrigg Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Learning for Life UK

The article Learning for Life UK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While their cause is valiant, this charity isn't notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 22:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Learning for Life UK for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Learning for Life UK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning for Life UK until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 12:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]