User talk:Jabeles

Image copyright problem with Image:8141.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:8141.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I by mistake accidentally removed some references and some of your input at Palestinian people. I appologise. Can you check it now as I returned to a prior version, and then I did what I intended to do then. I think your input is preserved but returned upfront instead of the origins of the Identity part. Please double check that I did not forget anything by mistake.

Almaqdisi ^{talk to me} 10:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jabeles for your comments at my page. You are very welcome to edit this page. Your insight will be always helpful.

You are right regarding the term Palestinian. In fact this term, which in arabic is Filistini, has appeared in many history books when refering to people from the region of Palestine or Filistin. It has not been limited to a particualr religion. For example, the family of Tamimi, one of the largest families of Palestine, was a christian family at one point. the chief of this family traveled to Medina in the early days of Islam to meet with the Prophet Muhammad. He later became a muslim along with his extended family just like many other tribes in Arabia itself. This guy was known in history book as Tamimi al-Dari al-filistini. Also, the engineer who build the Dome of the Rock was called, Raja' Bin Hayawah al-Filistini. So the word filistini or Palestinian was used in the Arabic literature for any one whose origins are from Palestine. Whether he was muslim, christian or Jews. In fact, the semitic Jews are Palestinian in origin and no question about that. This is what the article explains. Finally, I do not think any Palestinian would be upset or so when reading that some Jews are Palestinians because many Muslim Palestinian families are in origin Hebrew or Israelite. There is some documentation about these particular families mentioned by name in some old history book. Althouh some Arabian tribes in the ancient pre-Islamic times converted to Judaism. So things are really mixed here. But we can include such info as much as it relates to the Palestinian People subject.

Thanks Almaqdisi ^{talk to me} 03:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tick

I have moved Chip-Scale Atomic Clock to User:Jabeles/sandbox. The title should be chip-scale atomic clock so a move was needed anyway. Everything you have so-far put in the article belongs in the atomic clock article and indeed see the image in that article. So it is probably best for you to add to atomic clock. -- RHaworth 16:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I35W

I'm sure what you said about the bridge not being "over-engineered" and implying that this led to its collapse is spot on but unless you can provide a citation from a secondary source it's WP:OR. I do encourage you to find a source to back up your obervations though, I have a similar impression and did see a non-engineer's editorial in a New York newspaper briefly touch on that aspect of the bridge's design. Thanks for your understanding and cheers! Gwen Gale 15:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Injection laser

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Injection laser, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Injection laser is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Injection laser, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

decibel comparison for PMT

Something seems wrong to me about having two numbers, optical and electrical, in the pmt article. I thought the idea with decibels was to enable power comparisons. What would the "optical" power ratio be? Is the gain being discussed the gain in photocurrent from cathode to annode? I thought that since power is proportional to V² or I², you multiply the voltage or current log ratio by 2 to perform the squaring and then multiply by 10 to perform the bel to deci-bel conversion, so that you get the same result with a voltage or current log ratio as you would with a log power ratio. I think it is correct to say that if the photocurrent increases by 10⁸ that the power gain is really 160 dB, which is what the article stated a few days ago. I do not understand what the 80 dB value means. --AJim (talk) 19:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your improvement of Kitchen cabinet

Generally I like your copyedit. I worked on this article a while back when it was rather disorderly, wordy, and I tightened it. But I'm not a cabinet specialist or physicist, so your additions are welcome. My only suggestion is to try to keep it simple and straightforward as much as possible; avoid words like "formulations", for example. But overall great improvement!--Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thermofoil

Greetings and thank you for your additions. Can you provide references for the Thermofoil article you created? Regards, PDCook (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarnoff Corporation

A tag has been placed on Sarnoff Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pcap ping 19:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dmitri Z. Garbuzov.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dmitri Z. Garbuzov.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 23:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dmitri Z. Garbuzov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chip (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jabeles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]