User talk:JaaayDee

File source problem with File:Battle-los-angeles-5.jpg

I have explained my issue to wikipedia and have cited 10 pages that have similar references, and reposted my article. Either re-post my article or remove every similar reference in Wikipedia, you are being totally unfair. And to the user that posted on my facebook page without and just cause I have made a formal complaint to you on facebook, and if you cause me to lose fans due to your ill-judged post, I will be taking my issue up legally, please post a full and frank apology to all my fans immediately. --IllaZilla (talk) 04:18, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Battle-los-angeles-5.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 07:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Monstersposter081010.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Monstersposter081010.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 07:45, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Monstersposter081010.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monstersposter081010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skylinefairuse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skylinefairuse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Battle-los-angeles-5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Battle-los-angeles-5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Battle-los-angeles-5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Battle-los-angeles-5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Prometheus film"

A page you created, Prometheus film, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Breawycker (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2011 (UTC) I have explained my issue to wikipedia and have cited 10 pages that have similar references, and reposted my article. Either re-post my article or remove every similar reference in Wikipedia, you are being totally unfair. And to the user that posted on my facebook page without and just cause I have made a formal complaint to you on facebook, and if you cause me to lose fans due to your ill-judged post, I will be taking my issue up legally, please post a full and frank apology to all my fans immediately. --IllaZilla (talk) 04:18, 31 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.199.171 (talk) [reply]

Prometheus

This article was redirected per consensus at AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (film). The crux of it was WP:NFF, which says that we shouldn't have articles about future films that haven't commenced principal photography, because so many film projects wind up not getting made or changing completely by the time filming actually takes place (Prometheus is a good example: It's gone from "It's an Alien prequel!" to "No, it's a totally new concept & fictional universe" to "Well, maybe or maybe not. Nobody's telling.") Anyway, the consensus was that the information should stay in Alien (franchise) until the movie is actually filmed. At this point in its development we're relying too much on internet rumors, tweets, & other crap sources for info. Once the thing actually gets filmed there'll be much better source coverage from which to build an article. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook page

I have explained my issue to wikipedia and have cited 10 pages that have similar references, and reposted my article. Either re-post my article or remove every similar reference in Wikipedia, you are being totally unfair. And to the user that posted on my facebook page without and just cause I have made a formal complaint to you on facebook, and if you cause me to lose fans due to your ill-judged post, I will be taking my issue up legally, please post a full and frank apology to all my fans immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.199.171 (talk)

FYI, he's back. See 86.186.68.200 (talk · contribs). --IllaZilla (talk) 21:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Promlogofairuse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Promlogofairuse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]