User talk:JXChurchi

Welcome!

Hello, JXChurchi, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JXChurchi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was asked to make a request on a new page then I was blocked. I can't respond on the page but 1) the blacklist is being indexed by google and 2) words are being misconstrued. Public companies make announcements to the market, this is how BBC, FT and ShareBuyers source some news on the performance of companies. This is what I meant when I said the source of the news is the company itself as one your users said the website is a 'dubious source'. The point is the 'source' of the update was the same that the reference to the FT was replaced with. JXChurchi (talk) 19:08, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This template is for requesting an unblock of this account; not to continue the behavior that lead to the block. Specifically, you will need to address the problem with your conflict of interest and promotional activities. Kuru (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It has now been pointed out several times: the blacklist is NOT indexed by google (again, that would be extremely stupid of Google to use thát list for any form of ranking/analysis). The ONLY page that is (was) indexed by Google is a bot generated list-page (which should not be indexed and from now is not indexed by google anymore; anyway, your domain soon does not appear there anymore and hence, even if Google does index it it will not be found). That is the only page that appears (soon: appeared) on Google, and that page does not tell you that the page is blacklisted unless you look further. —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 19:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]