User talk:JTP88

Notability of Deboche

A tag has been placed on Deboche, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Violador Profissional

I've nominated Violador Profissional, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Violador Profissional satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violador Profissional and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Violador Profissional during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. War wizard90 21:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deboche songs

All of the articles on individual Deboche songs are being deleted as well. I got zero Google hits for Deboche + Deboshits. NawlinWiki 22:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Deboche which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Freakshow (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Freakshow (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Vol I.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Vol I.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vol I.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vol I.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]