User talk:JSydel

November 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have received multiple notices to not delete redlinks and maintenance templates, but you continue to do so. Since you have not provided a single edit summary and not engaged in discussion anywhere, I have blocked you for a short time. Please review your talk page history to review your warnings, and look at the edit summaries of reversions to your edits.

Many of your edits have useful aspects. Please heed the community guidelines and others will defend your edits instead of reverting them. Thanks, —EncMstr (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have now blocked you again, for one week, because you are still removing maintenance templates without providing any edit summaries to explain your motivation or discussing them at a talk page. Wikipedia relies on cooperating with other editors and on consensus, and you have been asked above to respect to our guidelines. So please this time to reflect on the advice we have given you, and try to be more communicative when you return from this new block. De728631 (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JSydel, while you are blocked, consider reading Wikipedia's core policies. There are not that many. Reading all of them will take less time than 20 or 30 edits. If you want to understand why your edits are being reverted, please consider the objectives of the project.

Five Pillars: the basis of all policies and guidelines

WP:REDLINK: the purpose and value of redlinks

—EncMstr (talk) 03:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your block evasion as JSydel893 (talk · contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves), your block is extended for a month. Too bad. Your block would have expired in less than 24 hours had you not continued the same objectionable pattern of edits as the other user. It is unlikely that you understand the purpose and goals of Wikipedia. —EncMstr (talk) 00:23, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]