User talk:JS5owner

File:Living waters spa.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Living waters spa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 07:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this file. I'm the owner of Living Waters Spa and I uploaded it.

Hi, THough the file may be deleted now it can be undeleted easily. To confirm that you are the copyright holder you will need to follow the simple email process at Wikipedia:Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries. Once done you can either wait until a volunteer gets to the email (this can take many weeks) or drop a note on my talk page and I'll check - Peripitus (Talk) 10:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DHS

Srich32977 - I've restored the DHS data regarding the BK. The source for this is The Desert Sun, Oct. 27, 2004. Your article does nothing to discuss the background, only that it did happen. Whereas The Desert Sun's artilce gives the jist of this paragraph.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Desert Hot Springs, California, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The material I supplied has a Reliable Source that mentions the BK of DHS. It is a start. But adding unsourced material to the article only diminishes its' creditbility. Thanks. --S. Rich (talk) 01:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JS5, please use the bottom of the talk page to add comments. That allows readers to follow the discussion in a logical, chronological fashion.

I have reverted your edits. The 2004 article is not available on-line (or at least I have not found it on-line). Accordingly, it is not subject to verification. When you simply say the material was published in The Desert Sun on such-and-such date, without making the actual article accessible to readers, you are not supplying WP:RS. Thanks. --S. Rich (talk) 20:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Desert Hot Springs appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. JS5, I paid the $3.95 to look at the Sun article you mentioned in this edit [1]. It had absolutely nothing that supported your contention that the city spent $9 million fighting a $3 million judgment. Please do not introduce factual errors into articles.--S. Rich (talk) 22:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Srich for adjusting the text. BTW, it wasn't my contention that the city spent $9m, it was whoever wrote the original article. I my point was that your original removal was a bit too much. Thanks for providing more data. This is what Wikipedia is all about!