User talk:JR Pietri

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Guinnog 19:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop you're blanking of Bubble hash. 68.39.174.238 19:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Guinnog 20:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask that you raise concerns in the article's talk page rather than adding poorly-written and unreferenced material? I invite you to revert your last edit as I already asked once before. Thanks --Guinnog 23:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting spam into the Bubble hash article. Wikipedia is not a vehicle to promote your company. 00:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.Viridae ^Talk 01:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Hi. You have been blocked from editing for having violated WP:3RR. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 12:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble hash

Hi. Can you please explain your issues with the picture you have deleted? Thanks. --Guinnog 13:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

I have created a discussion on the issues that are being fought about in the Bubble hash article at Talk:Bubble_hash#Issues. If you wish to comment, please feel free. Viridae ^Talk 14:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly have a problem with the content of the article. Please disscuss it with other editors on the talk page before making changes agaisn't consensus again. Viridae ^Talk 00:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

I have started an RfC on your behaviour in the Bubble hash article. Feel free to respond at the RfC. Viridae ^Talk 01:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me a link to the High Times Article May 1998 that you keep citing. I would be most interested in seeing it in it's fullness. Please also stop making accusatory edit summaries about people working for or promoting one thing over another, my only aim is for a balanced, all inclusive, well cited and encylopedic article on the subject, what's yours?

I have checked two of the three patent numbers you've quoted - they are patents for a "method and apparatus for extracting plant resins" which were given to it's inventor, Reinhard C Delp, in 1998. Canadian patent 2321815, US patent 6,158,591 none of them mention anything to do with cannabis let alone ice hash, why do you insist that only the one thing made with the one product one way is "Ice Hash" when everyone else seems quite happy accepting/appreciating there are different purities dependent on the process and they are called a variety of names? --Alf ^melmac 15:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

13 August 2006

You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. — FireFox ^(talk) _{20:27, 13 August '06}

On further investigation I notice you have already been blocked for violating the three revert rule on the same article, ten days ago. Therefore I have blocked you for a further 48 hours. — FireFox ^(talk) _{20:36, 13 August '06}

Bubble hash

Instead of continually inserting material into the article that other editors don't agree with, why don't you discuss it? Also you might liek to respond to your RfC. The link is up the page further. Viridae ^Talk 11:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]