User talk:JPHC2003

Welcome!

Hi JPHC2003! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 10:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Gary, Indiana Shooting (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See the notability guideline for events—they must show lasting coverage, which this does not appear to.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022 Gary, Indiana Shooting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPHC2003! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Gary, Indiana Shooting

Hello, JPHC2003. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Gary, Indiana Shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns of POV-pushing

Hey @JPHC2003, I recently reverted some of your recent edits to the pages regarding Ben Shapiro and the Killing of Trayvon Martin. I wanted to let you know that some of what is your basis for those edits seem to advance a personal view not reflected in RS and resembling WP:POV-PUSHING. It's of course important to give WP:DUE weight to both sides, but not reflect the opinionated viewpoint of politically-leaning sources like Mother Jones (it's okay to use them for facts pertaining to a subject, but shouldn't be used exclusively to describe a subject). Controversial topics like the Killing of Trayvon Martin should be approached with caution; I think it would be better to explicitly mention what the sources say instead of simply citing them (i.e. Mother Jones reported that...). GuardianH (talk) 02:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that's fine, sometimes I get caught up. I'm fine with the Ben Shapiro edit because I wrote in a bit of a bad mood. I agree with the need to cite them without a POV, but for the edit regarding the Killing of Trayvon Martin, Zimmerman statements in the recorded video provably contradicts his account of events in police interviews. Perhaps I chose a bad source, but I feel as though it is notable that very little on the internet other than 2 sources I could find (one of them that happened to be Mother Jones). But as long as someone else could point this out in some unbiased way I think that will be fine. I'll also avoid accidental opinion based editing. JPHC2003 (talk) 03:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding. It's important to always try to make edits objectively and without bad faith. If you need anymore help in deciding which sources to use or how to word them, you can ping me or another editor — there's also the TeaHouse, which has a lot of editors willing to help. GuardianH (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2022 Gary, Indiana Shooting

Hello, JPHC2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2022 Gary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 03:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Halloween (2007 film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Also, it's not necessary to add a category and its parent categories. Only the most specific category need be added. DonIago (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spin the Wheel (album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages You Were Meant for Me and Spin the Wheel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E;R (YouTuber) (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:E;R (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Tommy Abbott

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tommy Abbott, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Jaswinder Kaur Sidhu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slashing.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samer Abu Daqqa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Friedrich von Rüdiger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karlsbad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Elizabeth Pipko

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Elizabeth Pipko, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zionists

Hi. I've reverted a number of your recent edits. Attendance at a fund raiser, or being opposed to military action against civilians, are not an indication of Zionism, which is a much more specific ideology. Yes, these people may be motivated by belief in Zionism, but I think you need far greater indication than this before deciding it is a defining characteristic. Indeed, it could be argued that attending a fund raiser is trivia scarcely worth mentioning on the biography. As indeed was the case for Gerard Butler. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't also decide that the best way to describe an organisation is "Zionist", without any source, then decide that working with said organisation makes someone a Zionist. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The organizations being Zionist was right in the Wikipedia categories for those organizations, as well as their home pages on their websites. I can see why Butler shouldn’t be included, but Schlesinger and Goodwin should at least be included given how often they speak for Israel, especially on social media. JPHC2003 (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed them from those categories, for the same reasons. All the articles verified is that they supported, in some way, Israeli military personnel or Israel. The articles never so much as mention Zionism or Zionist, far less have it sourced. You'll have to show me where either is mentioned on the websites, I don't see it. If you can find it, you might add it to their articles, citing their website.

Does "speaking for Israel" make someone a Zionist? I don't think it's anything like that clear cut. Also keep in mind the usual requirement that the category should be defining. Not just a one-off, never referred to again. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:13, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]