User talk:JML1148/Archive 7
Ready for review Draft:Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center
[edit]I've rewritten the entry for the Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center and added few links. The entry is now waiting a review. Could you please do the review? This is a page about the national meteorological and Ukrainian government organization. Sinestro (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Sinestro: I have declined your draft, and left a comment there. Please read it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148: Thank you for your time.
- """ All of the sources appear to be passing mentions. I can't read the Verkhovna Rada source due to language issues, however we do need multiple sources, and all we have now is (possibly) one source.
- I'm flabbergasted about this decision.
- First of all, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center on the citation 3: Ukraine -> Institutional Information -> All Information -> Part 1 (NMS Mandate and Planning) -> 1.1 Title of the National Meteorological or Hydrometeorological Service (NMS): Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center
- https://community.wmo.int/en/members/ukr
- World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations. This reference alone should suffice, in my opinion. I decline to accept that Wikipedia doesn't accept UN as a credible source.
- I accept that this mention was hard to find. Here, the Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center is mentioned at the United Nations website:
- https://www.unccd.int/resources/knowledge-sharing-system/ukrainian-hydrometeorological-center
- Some other references:
- https://www.danubecommission.org/dc/en/useful-links/national-meteorological-and-hydrometeorological-services/
- https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/news/5Svxu7C3wDER5Hn41PLF51
- https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/news/2uCmjXgiRsaXf85TCM4Aj9
- https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580097
- https://mediacenter.org.ua/ukrainian-hydrometeorological-center-increase-in-water-levels-is-possible-in-eastern-regions-of-ukraine-due-to-forecasted-precipitation/
- https://news.yahoo.com/scientists-release-forecast-spread-radiation-184300641.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIT1liIMJ3qyf1MSP262fEsANX1DmgMEc6tbIFYzuZXV6d8p26GJN4yYYaKYSY33msnHd5M863s5FJ5gKZ0KIa3mVMnMoPrAOMahkdHvhMKNFhGw98vHog1LGGvF-mQ9Jv08RKr_UPu0fltWqvgK06xLhPBBZaEkJpj52INmUMY4
- https://babel.ua/en/news/90467-the-ukrainian-hydrometeorological-center-warned-of-possible-flooding-in-two-regions-due-to-the-overflow-of-the-desna-river
- https://www.saveecobot.com/us/platform/meteo_gov_ua
- Looking forward to your reply. Sinestro (talk) 07:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Sinestro: The decline was not about notability. Instead, it was about the fact that the sources only had passing mentions, that is, they did not mention the organisation enough to establish notability. This is better explained in WP:SIGCOV. I'll have a look at the sources you have provided shortly. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Sinestro: I've had a look through the sources that you have provided, and I'm not certain. The sources fail WP:SIGCOV mostly because they are either passing mentions or are related to the subject - either written by the centre, are reports of which the centre is a source for, or written by partners of it (e.g. the Finnish sources). However, because of the Verkhovna Rada and Earthdoc sources, I'm not to the point that I would accept it, but not to the point that I would decline. I think a more experienced editor would be in a better place to review it. I can advise you to find additional sourcing (preferably news reports) and add it to the article, along with the sources you have linked above. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 11:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- :::@JML1148: thank you for your explanations. I still fail to understand the criteria. Would you consider this source significant, independent, Reliable and secondary?
- https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/weather_factor_in_ukraine_war_how_military_meteorologists_help_the_ukrainian_forces_destroy_russians-5381.html
- Why do you consider articles from the Finnish Meteorological Institute a partner? What is the definition of the partnership: apart from having "meteorology" in the name?
- Here is my application of the four criteria from WP:NCORP:
- significant? - yes, it contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth. There are several articles that talk about UHMC
- independent? - yes, it is completely independent of the article subject. it is an independent source, located in another western country, Finland.
- Reliable? - yes, it meets the standard for being a reliable source. it is a respected institution, with many articles and mentions online.
- secondary - yes, it has no connection to UHMC.
- By the same merit, WMO publications also correspond these four criteria. There are a number of the ukrainian sources that talk about Ukrainian Meteorological Center. It is not forbidden to cite non-English articles, but I haven't included them. As a last resort argument, when I open a list of List_of_meteorology_institutions, literally half of them have only one or two references, why apply different standards to this article? I believe it correspond now the minimum criteria, and I'm sure once this article is published it will be improved by other people. Sinestro (talk) 13:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Sinestro: If there are Ukrainian sources, certainly add them to the article. I wouldn't be surprised if they are a better quality in terms of independence than the English-language sources. I think you need to expand the article using the sources you have found, and submit it. Regarding other meteorology institutions, there may be some articles that don't meet out notability guidelines. I'll look into that. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Sinestro: I've had a look through the sources that you have provided, and I'm not certain. The sources fail WP:SIGCOV mostly because they are either passing mentions or are related to the subject - either written by the centre, are reports of which the centre is a source for, or written by partners of it (e.g. the Finnish sources). However, because of the Verkhovna Rada and Earthdoc sources, I'm not to the point that I would accept it, but not to the point that I would decline. I think a more experienced editor would be in a better place to review it. I can advise you to find additional sourcing (preferably news reports) and add it to the article, along with the sources you have linked above. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 11:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Sinestro: The decline was not about notability. Instead, it was about the fact that the sources only had passing mentions, that is, they did not mention the organisation enough to establish notability. This is better explained in WP:SIGCOV. I'll have a look at the sources you have provided shortly. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 Optus data breach
[edit]The article 2022 Optus data breach you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2022 Optus data breach for comments about the article, and Talk:2022 Optus data breach/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Steve Barry (musician)
[edit]Hi there,
Article subject has received two major awards in Australian music (cited) and released many albums (cited by publication). Also holds an academic post. Notability is thereby established I suggest. Walton22 (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: The issue with your article is that all of the sources are related to the subject, failing WP:SIGCOV. Albums aren't a gauge for notability, and the awards don't amount to anything that would pass WP:MUSICBIO. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'll improve. Give me a few minutes Walton22 (talk) 02:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Added more notability to lede. Australian musician collaborating with esteemed USA drummer receives favourable review in UK magazine. Walton22 (talk) 02:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 OK now? Walton22 (talk) 02:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: I'm not convinced. WP:GNG requires multiple sources that meet its criteria, of which we have one that is tenuous. It's a review of an album that he created with other people. Ideally, we'd have 2-3 reliable sources that address Barry himself, and not his music. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll improve it. Walton22 (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 I've added Sydney Morning Herald coverage now. I think that's surely enough! Walton22 (talk) 03:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 ...and another one Walton22 (talk) 03:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: Thank you for the additional sources. I think there is a pretty good amount of sourcing, however I could see people objecting to that, so I'll leave it to another reviewer to have a look at it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: I'm not sure what's objectionable still. Tbh, I can't credit "Ideally, we'd have 2-3 reliable sources that address Barry himself, and not his music." Why not his music? Details of his personal life are surely not required? I can't see that a review in Jazzwise magazine is "tenuous' (read their WP entry) and I fail to see why "created with other people" is a downside, particularly when they're notable themselves as in Eric Harland. Walton22 (talk) 03:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: Of the sources that are independent, one is an interview (fails WP:SIGCOV) and the others are reviews that give no biographical detail. The SMH review is also pretty short. I am unsure, so I am handing it to another reviewer. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 Ok, thanks for clarifying. I have added an external link to independent biography. Walton22 (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148, note there is also a biography at his cited University of Sydney staff profile Walton22 (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 Ok, thanks for clarifying. I have added an external link to independent biography. Walton22 (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: Of the sources that are independent, one is an interview (fails WP:SIGCOV) and the others are reviews that give no biographical detail. The SMH review is also pretty short. I am unsure, so I am handing it to another reviewer. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: I'm not sure what's objectionable still. Tbh, I can't credit "Ideally, we'd have 2-3 reliable sources that address Barry himself, and not his music." Why not his music? Details of his personal life are surely not required? I can't see that a review in Jazzwise magazine is "tenuous' (read their WP entry) and I fail to see why "created with other people" is a downside, particularly when they're notable themselves as in Eric Harland. Walton22 (talk) 03:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: Thank you for the additional sources. I think there is a pretty good amount of sourcing, however I could see people objecting to that, so I'll leave it to another reviewer to have a look at it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 ...and another one Walton22 (talk) 03:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 I've added Sydney Morning Herald coverage now. I think that's surely enough! Walton22 (talk) 03:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll improve it. Walton22 (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Walton22: I'm not convinced. WP:GNG requires multiple sources that meet its criteria, of which we have one that is tenuous. It's a review of an album that he created with other people. Ideally, we'd have 2-3 reliable sources that address Barry himself, and not his music. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JML1148 OK now? Walton22 (talk) 02:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Added more notability to lede. Australian musician collaborating with esteemed USA drummer receives favourable review in UK magazine. Walton22 (talk) 02:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'll improve. Give me a few minutes Walton22 (talk) 02:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Susan Whelan (executive)
[edit]Hi JML1148. Just a quick note to remind you that according to WP:DRAFTIFY you should not move pages to draftspace if there is an assertion that the page belongs in mainspace
from another editor, in this case a contested PROD. The correct course of action at that point is to take the article to AfD. Thanks for all your hard work at NPP. – Joe (talk) 11:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
[edit]Hello JML1148,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp connect on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
[edit]- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
Aside: North American fraternities and sororities
[edit]A little commentary re: a comment you made at ANI.
In my opinion, the people who really do the concept of fraternities right are the historically Black fraternities and sororities, particularly the sororities. Most "mainline" fraternity members don't stay very active or connected to their organizations after graduating, but members of the historically Black organizations do, which leads them to have a network available in the post-college years. In the lead-up to the inauguration of Joe Biden, media coverage mentioned that Kamala Harris is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha.
I went to a professional development workshop a few years ago. The non-Black women did not really talk about whether they had joined sororities in college; the Black women did. It was instant bonding for the women who were members of the same sorority; if they were from different sororities, there was occasionally friendly rivalry, but really it was still mutual respect and being part of the overall organization.
And that's why I say they do it right: they embody being not just social organizations for the college years but service organizations for the college years and beyond. —C.Fred (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol needs your help!
[edit]
Hello JML1148,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
Technical news
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
Arbitration
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
[edit]- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
another FB group with paid editors
[edit]Hi James, FB has just given me another group of paid editors:-( if you want to take a look it's https://www.facebook.com/groups/wikipediapagescreator/?ref=share Neil Back ache (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Back ache: Interesting. I'll have a look into it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh... the group is join by request and the rules are in Hindi, so I don't think I'll be able to join. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't even look at the rules, I just applied and they let me in, it's only when I got in did I realise it's nature Back ache (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, I'll make a request then. 23:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC) JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't even look at the rules, I just applied and they let me in, it's only when I got in did I realise it's nature Back ache (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh... the group is join by request and the rules are in Hindi, so I don't think I'll be able to join. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 July newsletter
[edit]The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.
Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2023
[edit]
| ||||||
Hello --139047T (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- @139047T: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Do you have a question? JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK for 2022 Optus data breach
[edit]
On 16 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 Optus data breach, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2022 Optus data breach affected over a third of Australians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 Optus data breach. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 Optus data breach), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gilgo Beach serial killings on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
[edit]- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
Question from Vince45blue on List of last surviving World War II veterans (03:38, 23 July 2023)
[edit]Hello My Uncle just turned 100 years old on December 17. 2022 he was a Marine who was in Okinawa in 1945 --Vince45blue (talk) 03:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Vince45blue: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am assuming you want to add your uncle to List of last surviving World War II veterans. To do so, you'll have to have a reliable source, such as a newspaper mention, supporting your claim. From looking at the page, your uncle will need a "claim to fame", like the ones in the "Notability" section of the list. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 04:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
RfC closure clarification request
[edit]Hello. You recently closed this RfC about using the 5% rule. The question was specifically about using it for parliamentary elections (rather than presidential elections, which there is consensus for). Would you be able to clarify your close to expressly point out it applies to parliamentary elections only, rather than undoing a previous consensus for its use in presidential elections. Cheers, Number 57 12:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Number 57:
Done! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am Eddi Ameur inventor of the Orchid Potato Fries.
I quite overwhelmed by the processing to create a new article about my product. It definitely doesn't exist anywhere in the world.
Could I inquire your assistance?
Thanks --ShaEddi (talk) 03:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @ShaEddi: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Your creation of this product means you have a conflict of interest. You are strongly discouraged from writing an article with a conflict of interest. If you decide to do so, you must declare it on your user page and abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically the one on spam. THis is the main reason that your first draft on your user page was speedily deleted. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
AFD Discussion for Isn't It Now?
[edit]Hello - I have expanded this article and added 11 reliable sources. Please review your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isn't It Now?. Thanks! --BRIAN0918 16:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Brian0918: I've changed my !vote to keep. Thanks for the heads up. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 04:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
You may be interested to read
[edit]Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Post-block_conduct_at_User_talk:Jack4576 LibStar (talk) 04:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- @LibStar: Very interesting (and also somewhat sad) read. Thanks for the heads up. I had hoped that MaxnaCarta would be able to finally turn around Jack's disruptive conduct, but to see them denounce him in such strong terms is sad. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 04:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |