User talk:JMB101

Hello, and welecome to my talk page. Please leave a message and i'll try to get back to you.

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JMB101

Hi JMB101. I noticed you created a Requests for Adminship page some time ago; I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. I think it's fair to warn you that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets very high standards for editors running for adminship. That being said, I strongly urge you to read WP:GRFA, User:Davidwr/Administration is not for new users, and WP:NOTNOW, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that RfA and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Regards, FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JMB101

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JMB101, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 01:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna go ahead and delete this as it's doomed to fail at present and you'll want a fresh start on it. Dloh cierekim 01:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JMB101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admins, I understand what I have done, I will not do it again and I will only make constructive edits

Decline reason:

I enjoy being sucked up to ... well, actually, not for very long. But this totally fails to address the reason for your block: the sockpuppetry accusations. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JMB101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what i have done. A group of other wikipedia users used their accounts for abuseive reasons and you think I may be one of them. I ashure You i am not and will only make good edits

Decline reason:

No, we know exactly what you have done. You've created multiple accounts and used them for vandalism; on its own, your creation of User:Ello100 followed by User:Ello100 offering support in your request for adminship would have been sufficient to get you permanently banned. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.