User talk:JLL87

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello. While the advice you received at the Teahouse was good and accurate, our rules regarding paid editing were not mentioned. If you are being compensated to write an article, or expect to receive compensation, then you are required to disclose this fact. Please consult the page Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure to see if these rules apply to you, and if so, how to make the property mandatory disclosures. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South African Mineral Reporting Codes (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references appear to be to the codes themselves. Independent references are needed showing that independent reliable sources, such as magazines, have discussed the code.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South African Mineral Reporting Codes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South African Mineral Reporting Codes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JLL87! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, Do I need to completely remove all primary source references. I think otherwise the article has enough secondary sources. How is it that this article passes, yet it seems very promotional? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venmyn_Rand JLL87 (talk) 15:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South African Mineral Reporting Codes (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Cite third party sources: mainstream publication, magazines, newspapers and books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South African Mineral Reporting Codes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South African Mineral Reporting Codes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 09:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article. I have many third-party sources in my article, so I am struggling to understand what more can be done to improve it so that it may be accepted for submission. Please could you be more specific on which sections I need to change. Many thanks JLL87 (talk) 15:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Submission

Greetings. I was away from keyboard. For the question that you posted on my talkpage a few days ago, Robert McClenon has actually answered it. It was written on the submission. Your existing sources are not third party sources nor are they independent sources. There is a misconception here. Do read the link in blue about reliable sources. In essence, what you have cited are homepages and official websites, mostly in pdf files. Stay away from homepages and official websites, as they are primary sources, not third party sources. Cheers. EROS ^message 09:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. However, how is it that homepages and websites are not deemed third-party sources when such a page as the Venmyn Rand one includes many of these and yet it was published. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venmyn_Rand JLL87 (talk) 15:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South African Mineral Reporting Codes has been accepted

South African Mineral Reporting Codes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Legacypac! I'm trying to add something to the Page Title but find that I can't do that - please can you assist? I'd just like to add the acronym: SAMCODES. JLL87 (talk) 07:06, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't add tha to the title as it is not how we name pages. I can add it as a redirect to help people find it amd helpnwoth linking. Legacypac (talk) 10:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]