User talk:JKlaService

Your username is of concern

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "JKlaService", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be the name of a company, business or website. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response

From what I can follow you have raised a query regarding my user name it may look like a company to you but the JKla is a contraction of J'Kla my user name in the online Game Uru a name I have used for over eight years on finding out I was unable to use the apostrophy and unable to have a name of 4 characters and at the time in a hurry

I added Service as label as nearly all of my friends know I spent ten years as a serviceman in the RAF.

Conflict of interest?

Hello, JKlaService. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Newcastle Benfield F.C., you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:08, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Since my only contributions are clarification of issues of fact i.e. Names and name spellings of appointed officers. Club logo and sponsor names and playing colours for the current season as well as the regular update of the Official Club history all as per the published club committe minutes while I hold an official position I am not a member of the committee.

Also as all of these amendments are "neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;" merely a statement of historical fact.

I would hope that the published minutes as a matter of public record would be considered a viable source. Please clarify if this is not the case.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JKlaService (talk • contribs)

Depends on what you mean by "published". --Orange Mike | Talk 14:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By published I mean printed on paper and posted on the club notice board for the edification of anyone who visits the club. JKlaService

That may constitute "publication" under your local laws, but by "published" Wikipedia means printed in actual newspapers, magazines, websites with solid editorial control, or other reliable sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:54, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So what constitutes "or other reliable source"? JKlaService

See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, which has already been linked to twice under this header alone. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok please explain to me what is contensious about the away colours and the name of the appointed current team manager because thats the extent of my changes.

These are facts anyone can verify by attending a game I will bow to anyone who has supperior verifiable knowledge.

Will you please stop persecuting me over such trivial information. Information thats so trivial it's not worth posting anywhere else. JKlaService