User talk:JKGREINEDER

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hans-Ulrich Rudel has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓© 22:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Erich von Manstein. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓© 22:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Erich Hartmann constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓© 22:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Heinz-Wolfgang Schnaufer. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alfie ↑↓© 22:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Michael Wittmann. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Alfie ↑↓© 22:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Please discuss controversial edits with other users rather than repeating them ad-nauseum.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 22:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

JKGREINEDER (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

24.62.48.139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JKGREINEDER". The reason given for JKGREINEDER's block is: "Disruptive editing".

Blocking administrator: Vianello (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You'll be happy to know that you are now directly blocked for disruption; any further abuse of your talk page will lead to your talk page editing privileges to be revoked. Also, thank you for giving us your underlying IP address. –MuZemike 16:11, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

```` J. K. GREINEDER, MD, MBA -- 18 September 2010 -- 01:08 EDT

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

Thanks for blocking me. I now know that Big Brother (in the persons of 'Vianello' and 'Alfie') is watching. I have no idea on how to go about explaining my edits (or to whom), so I won't bother. My respect for Wikipedia has just crashed. It is obviously a forum to perpetuate silly propagandist formulae, by self-righteous know-nothings!

ADDENDUM -- 18 September 2010 -- 16:33 EDT

The author(s) of the articles on German WWII soldiers are engaging in the most scurrilous attacks on the integrity of these patriots. The German heroes who are described did NOT fight for Hitler or the NS-Party. They fought, bled, and died for "Volk und VaterlandItalic text" and full honor is their due. Wikipedia is abetting the vilest type of anti-German propaganda --- AND exercising censorship, to boot.

FYI --- There has NEVER been a country named "Nazi Germany" (or "Weimar Republic" for that matter) --- only one named "Deutschland" (with some variations based on prevailing political winds).

FYI (more) --- By allowing the egregious propagation of spurious 'facts,' Wikipedia is complicit in the degradation of our information system through manipulation of 'words.' Even one false word introduced into a sentence or a paragraph discredits the ENTIRE statement or argument.

I will never again make any contribution to Wikipedia (I had made two, apparently uncontroversial and not challenged) and will henceforth focus on Google for my informational excursions.

Wikipedia's 'watchdogs' and enforcers should be ashamed of themselves.

Or you could, perhaps, discuss changes rather than edit warring, like the temporary block notification suggested you would be able to continue to edit freely by doing. But I suppose that is more time-consuming than getting sanctimonious about it, it's true. See also: WP:The Truth. If by chance you want to make another monologue, you might also want to check out the article on "Fallacy of composition" so as not to repeat some of your logical pitfalls. But, if you're more interested in in trying to wrangle in your stance by "force", I think we'll manage quite well (and without shame) without your contributions. - Vianello (Talk) 00:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JKGREINEDER (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Juergen K. Greineder, MD 03:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No contrition or acknowledgement of unacceptable conduct (quite the opposite, in fact). Talk page access disabled due to continued soapboxing. Nick-D (talk) 07:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

22 July 2011 (request to unblock --- don’t know if I did it right) I objected to derogatory characterization of ALL German WW II soldiers as "Nazis" --- an offensive act by authors who know not what they do. Since there is no Editorial Board (a grievous omission), I have/had no way to address this systematic insult to German soldiers who (like normal patriots) fought for "Volk und Vaterland." I do not regret what I did (remove the "Nazi" from the 'allegiance') --- and this whole disgusting episode is sticking in my craw. FYI --- there has NEVER been a country named "Nazi Germany" --- or "Weimar Republic" --- only "Deutsches Reich" (1871--1945) or Deutschland (Germany) for short. If you want to continue to wallow in your benighted condition, be my guest. Even if you restore my editing privileges (I had made two previous--unchallenged--contributions) I will not participate in, or promote, Wikipedia until these insults to one of the best Armed Forces on the planet cease. The ball is in your court. Juergen K. Greineder, MD, MBA (born in the Reichshauptstadt Berlin)