User talk:JJ.Jarrett

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JJ.Jarrett. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the other people biting you, don't let them get you down. I'm an administrator here, and I'd like to say that I hope you stay around! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will note you should read WP:EW and familiarize yourself with it well too, just to ensure you don't run into any problems heading forward.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JJ.Jarrett (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saffron Henderson IS still active.

She is still active in the voice acting business. I just heard her in Ocean's dub of Gintama as a little boy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8000 Saiyan (talk • contribs) 20:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source is needed. Also is she actually credited? "I just heard her" is not proof, needs to actually be credited. JJ.Jarrett (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Slayer. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how my edits were "disruptive" as you say? --JJ.Jarrett (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If a current member of a band is formerly a session/touring member, they are mentioned in the same line, not mentioned twice in the same band section. Call me "idiot" or anything along those lines again – not even taking into consideration your edits themselves – and you'll be blocked. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's stupid, there's 2 sections for a reason. Lol I don't give a crap big man, quit acting you're some kind of authority over me. You're just a loser Wiki admin. You're nobody important, Wikipedia is not respected by or accepted as a reliable source by any academic institution so maybe stop acting like you're someone special who must be obeyed at all times or else! xD JJ.Jarrett (talk) 22:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:44, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

JJ appears to be evading his block via Special:Contributions/82.40.107.245. Two interaction tools show similar patterns and interests: Intertwined contributions and Editor interaction. The same communication style is expressed in the edit summaries. Binksternet (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Friday 13th

I see you have made the requested changes to the article I redirected. Good to know that you took note of my advice. However, the article is still rather short on decent referencing. You can remove the links to sales outlets as that could be considered promotional. Deb (talk) 09:59, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive quoting

Quoting comes under the fair use allowance. It is allowed if the quote helps people understand more than if it were written in free text. If it was a famous quote we could preserve it. In the case of gameplay, you could write this in your own words, to have equivalent meaning. The same applies to plot summaries. You should rewrite the big quote in Friday the 13th: Killer Puzzle at your earliest convenience, because I think it is good to have a gameplay section (without any quote). Where quotes could be used in a game article is short quotes from reviewers. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite certain the developers would have no issue with the quote being there because at the end of the day it's free publicity for their game and isn't causing them any copyright harm. As someone who hasn't actually played the game as it's not yet available in the UK, I don't think i'd be the one to put it into my own words accurately. I see no issue leaving it as a quote for now. I'm sure once the game gets released in other countries more editors will contribute to the page. JJ.Jarrett (talk) 03:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"free publicity for their game" -- Can't believe you said that. Don't you understand wikipedia's position on advertising? Deb (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do but let's face it, facts are facts. 9 times out of 10 Wikipedia is the first place people end up when searching for a certain topic. JJ.Jarrett (talk) 11:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alice (Friday the 13th). Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.40.107.245 Binksternet (talk) 23:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JJ.Jarrett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]