User talk:JIP/Archive 19

Wataaaaah!

Hi, I created Bruce Lee (video game) today, not realising that you had already made Bruce Lee (1984) (which was renamed to Bruce Lee (computer game).) I've merged much of your text to my version and redirected it, hope you don't mind, feel free to expand, pop the C64 loading screen image in there perhaps, etc. Cheers, Marasmusine 20:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

On 27 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bibi Blocksberg, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 21:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ressu Comprehensive School

Looked like spam to me, and likely copyviol, although I didn't check for that Jimfbleak 04:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Our objective is to help the children and adolescents in their growth to honest, responsible, cooperative and inquisitive individuals appreciating the diversity of skills and environments. We want to provide each pupil with strong basic skills and knowledge, prepare them for future studies and support the development of their social skills and healthy self-esteem.

RESSU MISSION STATEMENT

Respects everyone’s right to good and efficient learning
Gives everybody the opportunity to contribute to common issues
Respects everyone’s human dignity
Respects each person’s cultural background and does not tolerate violence, discrimination or racism of any kind
Takes responsibility for its environment

Sorry

I wasn't thinking. It was a typo. However you should be impressed I'm the only person in my grade that knows the capital of your country. ;) --Pupster21 Talk To Me 11:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didcap

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Didcap, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. --Jtalledo (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Anyway, I was concerned that there were no reliable sources on the topic, so it would be unverifiable. Maybe it should be merged and redirected to a main article? --Jtalledo (talk) 15:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Damsel in distress maybe? JIP | Talk 05:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of USS Thagard NCC-652 Page

As a former member and leader of this organization's page, I would like to respectfully request that this page be undeleted so that I may veiw and update its content. 71.185.28.192 20:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As this was a prod deletion, it should be automatically undeleted upon request. I've done so, as you should have done instead of opening the deletion review. If you believe we are better off without the article, please feel free to nominate for AFD. GRBerry 21:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did not know PROD deletions should be automatically undeleted upon request. I have no wish to further propose the deletion of this article. JIP | Talk 21:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:USS Thagard NCC-652

With regards to this article being linked from a list, I don't recall doing this, but the logs say otherwise. Please proceed as you see best. Likely, I was doing bottom level maintaince at the time I did this. The error is what it is. I have no further comment or interest in this matter. Thanks for your time and consideration. meatclerk 04:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marquis Jet Article

This is regarding the Marquis Jet article that was deleted on September the 17th. I am still unsure of the reason why the page was taken completely down. Could you please inform me as to why the page was deleted and on how to rewrite it in order for it be appropriate for Wikipedia. Please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you very much.

19:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Non-canon Star Trek

Can you comment on the Starfleet ranks and insignia talk page? I see you were involved in a previous discussion about non-canon material, so your insight would be most welcome! Thanks! Dreadstar † 07:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Dreadstar † 14:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Marquis Jet Page

I have still not received a response on the reasoning for the deletion of the Marquis Jet page. I would like to have this article to be reconsidered and put back up. Please let me know what the reason was that you deleted it and what can be done to put it back up. Thanks. -- Arazara 13:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was mostly routine PROD clean-up. The article looked to provide too little outside references. I will put it up on deletion review so it can have a chance to be put back up. JIP | Talk 15:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. How and when will I know what the outcome will be? [[[User:Arazara|Arazara]] 16:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Check the WP:DRV page. Usually it takes a bit less than a week. JIP | Talk 16:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JIP. I'm an admin and was looking at Marquis Jet DRV. There doesn't seem to be a reason to hold it open much longer since blatant advertising really doesn't seem to apply to the article. Advertising, yes, but not so blatant as to require speedy deletion. Also, I did a search and there is a ton of reliable source material on Marquis Jet. You can overturn your own decision, which I recommend. There seems to be no reason to leave your good name at DRV for seven days for the rabble to rouse against. Best. -- Jreferee t/c 00:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Transformers episodes

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Transformers episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Transformers episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Transformers episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 00:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding subpages

I have a question. I know here on wikipedia we are not to create "in-universe" and detailed biographies of characters, on the actual article, such as, say, Vito Corleone. I was wondering if I am allowed to create an extensive, in-universe biography on a user subpage? --Victor (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At least I don't see why not. JIP | Talk 07:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. Just wanted to make sure there would be no problem before doing so. --Victor (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Wikipedia meetup in Helsinki?

Hello! Are you interested in a meetup for contributors of the English language Wikipedia in Finland? If so, please comment at Wikipedia:Meetup/Helsinki (and, of course, invite other Wikipedians you know who might be interested). Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 11:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Encounter page

Hello. I'm interested in knowing what the content of the Encounter (Psychology) page was before it was deleted. Is there a way you could post it to my talk page? The concept is important and I'm considering making a contribution about it. Thanks Whitespace (talk) 01:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've reviewed the material and, given that it addresses a concept considered important by Carl Rogers, R D Laing and Jerzy Grotowski, I think it is worth restoring the article. I'm sure references and citations could be found in due course. What do you think? Was there a discussion held over it's deletion? Whitespace (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you discuss this with me here? I'd rather resolve this with you personally than invoke a deletion review. If I don't hear from you after a week, I'll assume you're not interested and are okay with the article being restored. Thanks. Whitespace 02:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the article being restored. JIP | Talk 04:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Lefler

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robin Lefler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Robin Lefler. Ejfetters 08:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New version of BDSM

Hi JIP, the translation of the featured German article de:BDSM has now been online for a few weeks. I remember you giving info on dresscodes in Finland somewhere, so maybe you are interested. Further references might be usefull, please feel free to add. ;-) Regards.--Nemissimo 15:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article I wrote is available at dresscode (BDSM), but I don't know how to add it into the main BDSM article, or even if it needs to be. JIP | Talk 19:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. If you can add referenced on the legal situation in Finland one day it would be useful (see BDSM#Legal status). ;-) I try to give an international perspective on the topic.--Nemissimo (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one thing I forgot... of course your opinions are highly welcome on the talk page were at the moment a general discussion on varios aspects is taking place. ;-) Kind regards.--Nemissimo (talk) 14:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

M-Learning

Hi JIP, I'm currently trying to clean up and improve the page on M-learning. There are re-appearing commercial links, as well as a rather shambolic article, but I'm going to go to work and get this page looking good over the hols. :)

I have a question, though. One of the links to a commercial site (in the "Sources" section of the article) currently links to an academic "paper" - but this paper is, partially, a case study of a particular commercial product. It kinda falls into a grey area as some of the information in the paper might be useful, but it has a slight commercial orientation. Should I remove this link or leave it in? There are plenty of (better) papers without commercial bias that could be included in the "sources" section. But if I remove it, I'll bet that the commercial organisation behind this link (and the other commercial links) will try to find another way to get their link in there!

I'd appreciate your experience and expertise on this delicate issue...

Cheers, L. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlearning (talk • contribs) 01:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Caber

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joe Caber, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Joe Caber. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nol Kastiigan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nol Kastiigan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nol Kastiigan. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jiterica

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jiterica, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Jiterica. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dikembe Ulelo

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dikembe Ulelo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Dikembe Ulelo. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Domenica Corsi

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Domenica Corsi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Domenica Corsi. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P8 Blue

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article P8 Blue, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of P8 Blue. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kieran Duffy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kieran Duffy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kieran Duffy. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bart Faulwell

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bart Faulwell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bart Faulwell. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cole Paris

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cole Paris, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cole Paris. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phigus Simenon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phigus Simenon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Phigus Simenon. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soloman

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Soloman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Soloman. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dtm (nightclub)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dtm (nightclub), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dtm (nightclub). Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dtm (nightclub)

A tag has been placed on Dtm (nightclub) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 23:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]