User talk:JI2013IR-BM

Repost of Adrian Visby (LadyDelay)

A tag has been placed on Adrian Visby (LadyDelay) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. JI2013IR-BM (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adrian Visby (LadyDelay)

Hello JI2013IR-BM,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adrian Visby (LadyDelay) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Whispe ring 06:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Adrian Visby (LadyDelay), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --みんな空の下 (トーク) 07:31, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Horizontal Law (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 08:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]