User talk:JGab12


User Page	Talk	Contributions

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of June 2018.

This is JGab12's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to JGab12.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JGab12. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Routine removal of IPBE flag

Hello JGab12, as you have been inactive for over a year, we will be processing a routine removal of your IPBE flag, unless you have a specific use-case you can identify by replying here. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 18:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Hello, to follow up on the message above: this account flag has been removed for inactivity. Should you require this again in the future you may request by following the directions on this page: Wikipedia:IP block exemption. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 00:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Top ten male doubles tennis players templates

A number of "Top ten male doubles tennis players" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Top ten male doubles tennis players templates. Nigej (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malika Auger-Aliassime for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malika Auger-Aliassime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malika Auger-Aliassime until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bonoahx (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlotte Petrick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Petrick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Petrick (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bonoahx (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for History of the Ottawa Senators (1992–)

History of the Ottawa Senators (1992–) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 02:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]