User talk:JCroft04

July 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Second Temple Judaism have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Second Temple Judaism was changed by JCroft04 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853288 on 2023-07-10T08:56:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Second Temple Judaism. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per the policy MOS:ERA: "An article's established era style should not be changed without reasons specific to its content; seek consensus on the talk page first (applying Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Retaining existing styles) by opening a discussion under a heading using the word era, and briefly stating why the style should be changed." Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 09:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Herod the Great, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 15:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Emma Corrin, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi JCroft04! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of William, Prince of Wales several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:William, Prince of Wales, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Comments like "I will keep changing it" indicate that you may intend to continue to revert to your preferred version against consensus. That would be unwise and would be seen as edit-warring.. DrKay (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Democratic Alliance (South Africa). Greenman (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like you to tell me where this vandalising was? I corrected mistakes of titles. JCroft04 (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]