User talk:JCFuniverse

Welcome!

Hi JCFuniverse! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 11:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Jarrah Tree. I have a lot of questions to ask , but can't find who will listen; I wish you can JCFuniverse (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps - what are the issues? JarrahTree 11:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need to know how adding a thumbnail picture of the content I am writing can be done and how the story headings (topic by topic) are set up. When I say story headings, I mean the sidebar or navbar items that, when clicked, take the user to the corresponding section within the same Wikipedia content. Am I, as the content author, supposed to do all of that, or are there people within the Wikipedia team who handle this? JCFuniverse (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest picking an article that is close to your interest(s), and reverse engineer - the wikipedia team is not really an entity - a lot depends on your topic as to whether you have anyone interested in what you are doing... only then are you likely to be 'visited' if you slip up in any way and need guiding... there are also intro videos that might be of use, a lot depends on you preferred method of skill building...

But it takes time, acculturation into wikipedian logic, and the ways things work... JarrahTree 12:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

however

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adekola_Sulaiman_Adeniyi

has about everything that is WP:NOT

~~if you want I can tell you everything about why and how...~~ JarrahTree 12:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the well-detailed response. I appreciate it. I think I will just delve further into the help page to gain more knowledge on writing Wikipedia content. JCFuniverse (talk) 15:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - your item at draft has more problems than you can imagine, best of luck JarrahTree 01:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that's scary, please tell me what am doing wrong on my draft item 🙏 JCFuniverse (talk) 16:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too much detail, reads like a CV or self made bio: -

It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources, such as your résumé or curriculum vitae, is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

So thats for a start... JarrahTree 09:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will make the corrections immediately. The person in this content is actually my Dad and he drafted everything I am posting JCFuniverse (talk) 11:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Far too much information, and BOLD is not normally used in references, it should be about a tenth of the size - always better to start small, minimise as much as possible. The important thing is to make sure there are adequate WP:RS JarrahTree 11:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please point the part you're referring to by the header title JCFuniverse (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still like a CV and not an encyclopedia article - far too much information, and likely to be rejected by a reviewer - WP:NOT, WP:ABOUT - trim, trim, trim... just advice though... JarrahTree 06:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at this point, I don't understand what you mean by It's "like a CV and not an encyclopedia article". You said trim , trim, trim, what should i trim , which part? coz If encyclopedia article doesn't allow enough details /information about the subject, then I don't know what to trim and not trim. JCFuniverse (talk) 14:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

or you help make the necessary edits I'd appreciate that. JCFuniverse (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at an enyclopediac article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floyd_R._Watson

There is no need to know every detail of work at all... There is far too much detail in your draft, the article list is classic WP:NOT - too many items, and it can be reduced - but you need to get a handle on doing it yourself... If an item of

information in the article is not going to be verified by WP:RS then it could be removed... JarrahTree 10:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good evening as at the time in Nigeria. Please checkout my new edits, i just make some corrections according to your suggestions: trimming. JCFuniverse (talk) 17:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Sulaiman Adekola.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sulaiman Adekola.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

check now JCFuniverse (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adekola Sulaiman Adeniyi (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Headbomb was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Specifically this reads like a WP:RESUME

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adekola Sulaiman Adeniyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JCFuniverse! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adekola Sulaiman Adeniyi (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Vast amounts are unsourced, and much is routine (WP:Mill)and should be removed. Please look carefully at other bios.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adekola Sulaiman Adeniyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]