User talk:JBreda24

Notability of Joseph I Breda Jr.

A tag has been placed on Joseph I Breda Jr., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Charles 17:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Joseph I Breda Jr., you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, attribution, and autobiography.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

First off, I deleted the above article as orignial research that did not include any relaible third-party/external sources. Second off, regarding the message you posted on my page, you must have me confused with somebody else. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For an article about anything to really be accepted here, it has to pass wikipedias notability standards found WP:NOTE. This genreally means the subject of the artilcle has been the subject of a third party work or external source. In most other situations, it is considered a vanity article. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]