User talk:JAltman752

Social anxiety article

The material you added to the article Social anxiety has been removed because it was an advertisement for the services of a particular psychotherapist. There are many psychotherapists who work with social anxiety, and there is no reason for us to single one of them out. Wikipedia is not an advertising service or a directory of service providers. Please do not re-add this kind of material to Social anxiety or any other article. If you are interested in contributing productively to Wikipedia, check out our welcome page. FreplySpang 17:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate external links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. JoeSmack ^Talk 01:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your note

You said, "Then make a list of psychotherapists, including Jonathan Berent, so that Wikipedia readers can learn about them and decide for themselves which ones are the best." That's not what our project is about. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. We make a point of saying that Wikipedia is not a directory, and that's what you're asking for. It sounds like Dr. Berent is helpful to a lot of people, which is great, but Wikipedia is not the place to promote his services. FreplySpang 16:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Manb0z4L69G3UdS1k5GB8bSl1fY-dXPk0300.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manb0z4L69G3UdS1k5GB8bSl1fY-dXPk0300.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

One Life to Live

Thanks for the heads-up, I fixed the article; but that was very strange, the sections didn't show in the revision screens when they disappeared or when I put them back. TAnthony 16:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I just realized what happened; the user had put a hidden note in the coming & going section but didn't "close it off", so it hid everything after that. The sections were there, just not showing, which is why they weren't in the edit notes as removed. Anyway, all fixed, thanks again. :) TAnthony 17:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Soap Operas recruitment

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 19:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetization and collation

I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Alphabetization and collation. -- Wavelength (talk) 17:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fusion Cosmetics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fusion Cosmetics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusion Cosmetics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 18:45, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Soap Operas alert

As a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas, and in accordance with the appropriate notification in deference to canvassing, I am alerting your attention to several current discussions for deletion pertaining to soap opera characters. This is an invitation to participate in the discussion. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 19:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seamus (dog)

Seamus (dog), an article which is part of WikiProject presidential elections has been proposed for deletion. Feel free to join the discussion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination) HHIAdm (talk) 23:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]