User talk:JASpencer/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:JASpencer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article Benedictional has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffetalk 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The article Votive office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffetalk 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Indult Catholic for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indult Catholic (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Veverve (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"Definitions, Theological" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Definitions, Theological and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 24#Definitions, Theological until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 16:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
"Medicine and Canon Law" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Medicine and Canon Law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Medicine and Canon Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
"Consent (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Consent (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Consent (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
"Compromise (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Compromise (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Compromise (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
"Indult Catholic" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Indult Catholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Indult Catholic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugh Rossi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Butler.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Left Democratic Front (Maharashtra) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left Democratic Front (Maharashtra) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Rathfelder (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
"Bigamy (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12#Bigamy (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Will and testament of clerics for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will and testament of clerics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Veverve (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
"Consanguinity (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Consanguinity (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12#Consanguinity (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 13:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
"Bigamy (in Civil Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Civil Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 19#Bigamy (in Civil Law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Military ranks in the Bible for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military ranks in the Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.