User talk:JAKEDAD88

July 2022

Hello, I'm 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3AA4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3AA4 (talk) 01:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please clarify your association with 66CATMAN (talk · contribs). Thank you, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3AA4 (talk) 01:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cullen328 (talk) 20:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JAKEDAD88. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please address this matter or be blocked from editing the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 15:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to be unblocked. I do not have a close connection with the artist. I know of her and wanted the reading public to see what and who she is. I've seen many other artists on WIKIPEDIA whose pages are flagrantly abused by self promotion. I have toned down, after many attempts, to make it more in line with your criteria. I've read all the pages you suggested, etc. I truly feel that my account should be reversed so that I can finally get it to the point that satisfies wiki. JAKEDAD88 (talk) 15:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you need four accounts. Also, nothing good will happen if you do not address the obvious conflict of interest. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]