User talk:JACKONEAL

Welcome!

Hello, JACKONEAL, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ralph Wesley Kennedy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 02:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ralph Wesley Kennedy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ralph Wesley Kennedy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seven seals

Jackoneal, please take this matter (your preference of one translation over another) to the talk page. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kristin Conzet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Drmies. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I know someone" is not listed at WP:Identifying reliable sources or at WP:Verifiability. At best, it qualifies as original research, which Wikipedia does not use. Also, when you say "new american bible translation, it is actually the first one to come to existence," you sound like a troll. The New American Bible was published in 1970 and was based on the Confraternity Bible, which was in turn based on the Vulgate. The King James Bible (currently cited) was first published in 1611, and was based on the 14th century Wycliffe's Bible that was in turn based on the Vulgate. If you mean that the NAB is based on the oldest manuscripts, you're wrong again because it is (again) based on the Vulgate, and there are modern translations based on the Dead Sea Scrolls. I would start to wonder if you meant "it is the only Bible approved by the Catholic Church for Mass in the United States," but that's not what you said at all. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]