User talk:J786m

This is J786m's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sattari Jame Mosque (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SportingFlyer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 00:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, J786m! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer talk 00:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sattari Jame Mosque (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add sources before re-submitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 16:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of more than one account

It looks as though you are using two or more accounts. What is more, there have been edits from more than one account to the same page, which is likely to mislead other editors into thinking that the edits were made by more than one person. To avoid such confusion, and also to avoid the risk that other editors may get the impression that yo are trying to be deceptive, it is much better to stick to one account unless there are strong reasons for not doing so, in which case you should post clear statements from both accounts stating that they are run by the same person. Even if you do that, avoid using more than one account to edit the same page, or on different pages in connection with the same thing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the "Articles for creation" system

The purpose of having drafts which can be submitted as articles for creation is to help new editors to avoid deletion of new articles they create, by getting help from experienced editors who have a better idea what is likely to be considered acceptable. It is not advisable for an inexperienced editor to ignore the advice of three different experienced editors who think a draft is not suitable, and go ahead and move the draft to an article, because the most likely effect of doing so is that the new article will get deleted very quickly. The draft which you moved is still nowhere near ready to be an article, so I have moved it back to draft space to help you avoid deletion. I strongly advise you not to move it yourself again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have now submitted the same draft five times without making any changes at all to try to address the reason for rejection, which is lack of sourcing. Continually resubmitting the same draft without any attempt to address the reason for rejection achieves no useful purpose, and takes up reviewers' time which could be more usefully employed on other work. If you do the same again it is likely that you will be blocked from editing to prevent further waste of other editors' time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.